S. V. LIPEN
Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow 125993, Russian Federation
In a view of modern processes of development of post-industrial society, globalization, information and digitalization of social relations, the importance of science-based forecasts of the development of legal phenomena, political and legal system as a whole. The prognostic function is traditionally indicated among the functions of legal science. The prognostic method is not always called and characterized among the methods of legal science.
The aims and objectives of the study are to clarify the status of prognostic methodology in the system of methods of legal science, in the formulation of a number of methodological problems of legal forecasting.
The study was conducted on the basis of general scientific and private scientific methodology, using logical, systematic, structural and functional, historical and other methods.
In modern conditions the prognostic concept should be included in every social and political-legal theory. The use of legal forecasting is necessary to study the prospects for the development of state legal institutions, it is considered as a necessary condition for the improvement of the Russian legal system. The task of developing a proper prognostic methodology, technology of application of the prognostic method is relevant. Currently we can state a certain level of development of a number of methodological problems - in modern legal science characterized objects and levels, areas, types and limits, stages and individual methods of legal forecasting. Various positions and approaches suggest further clarification of these methodological issues, primarily approaches to the definition of stages and methods of legal forecasting. Also relevant is the orientation of the general theoretic and branch legal studies on the use of predictive methodology. It is necessary to develop the doctrine of the methodology of legal science in terms of clarifying the status of the prognostic method, which should be specified and characterized in the framework of this doctrine, along with formal dogmatic, historical, comparative legal and other methods actively used in the study of political and legal reality.
legal forecasting, methods of legal science, prognostic methodology, legal foresight, forecasting of consequences of adoption of normative legal acts.
Lipen S.V. Prognostic Methodology in Legal Research. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.1
Agamirov K. V. Legal Forecasting as Factor of Improvement of the Russian Legal System. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 8, pp. 25—36. (In Russ.)
Agamirov K. V. Problemy yuridicheskogo prognozirovaniya: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika. Moscow, 2015.
Egorova N. E., Ivanyuk O. A. Legal Reality and Juridical Prognosis. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 12, pp. 152—156. (In Russ.)
Filippova S. Yu. Funktsii nauki grazhdanskogo prava. Pravovedenie, 2017, no. 4.
Filippova S. Yu. Nauka grazhdanskogo prava kak obekt tsivilisticheskogo issledovaniya. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2017.
Gavrilov O. A. Strategiya pravotvorchestva i sotsialnoe prognozirovanie. Moscow, 1993.
Isaev I. A. “Mashina vlasti” ili legalizatsiya tekhniki. Lex Russica, 2019, no. 1.
Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102.
Kornev A. V. Marksizm i sovremennost. Pravo, zakon i sud v rannikh trudakh Karla Marksa (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya K. Marksa). Ed. by V. V. Lazarev. Moscow, 2019.
Lazarev V. V. Predislovie. Pravo, zakon i sud v rannikh trudakh Karla Marksa (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya K. Marksa). Ed. by V. V. Lazarev. Moscow, 2019.
Lomteva V. S. Prognozirovanie v pravotvorchestve i pravoprimenenii. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2006.
Novichkov V. Ye. Prognozirovanie v sfere borby s prestupnostyu v sovremennoy Rossii. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2005.
O normativnykh pravovykh aktakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (initsiativnyy proekt federalnogo zakona). 5th ed. Ed. by T. Y. Khabrieva, Yu. A. Tikhomirov. Moscow, 2019.
Ostroumov C. S. O prognosticheskikh issledovaniyakh v oblasti kriminologii. Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad, 2012, no. 1.
Radchenko V. I., Ivanyuk O. A., Plyugina I. V., Tsirin A. M., Chernobel G. T. Practical Issues of Forecasting Legislation and Efficiency of Application of Forecasted Norms. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2008, no. 8, pp. 3—14. (In Russ.)
Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Moscow, 2016.
Syrykh V. M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obshchey teorii prava. Vol. 1: Elementnyy sostav. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2001.
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Pravo: prognozy i riski. Moscow, 2015.
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Yuridicheskoe prognozirovanie. Moscow, 2018.
Yu. V. ANOKHIN, M. P. BARANOV
Yu. V. ANOKHIN, Barnaul Law Institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Barnaul 656038, Russian Federation
M. P. BARANOV, Barnaul Law Institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Barnaul 656038, Russian Federation
Changing of information place in human life, process of globalization, political processes that change the face of the planet, struggle for markets, a series of financial crises - all these apects lead to escalating competition between states, followed by a sharp ideological confrontation. In the escalating competition era the existence and development of states depends on states' performing all the duties, among which the ideological function is one of the most important, in our opinion.
The purpose of this work is to study actual problems of the virtual space as a special communicative sphere notable for a number of features that allow a state to perform the ideological function more effectively.
Objectives of the study: to give a general theoretical description of the ideological function performing by the state in the virtual space.
In the process of the research the authors used general scientific and private scientific methods. The methodological basis of the work is the dialectical method of cognition. In addition to that, other methods are also used: rather-legal - at studying the specifics of the ideological function implementing in the virtual space in foreign countries; linguistic interpretation - at defining concepts used in the study; functional method provides insight into important characteristics of the virtual space ensuring the performing ideological function by the state in the modern conditions.
The authors come to the conclusion that the emergence and development of virtual space has had a significant impact on implementing the methods of performing ideological function by the state. On the one hand, the virtual space opens wide opportunities for the government to carry out propaganda and persuasion, providing a previously unseen audience of recipients involved in information exchange, but, on the other hand, the huge competition between information sources in a difficultly controlled space can reduce these benefits to a minimum.
ideological function of the state, virtual space, control over information, multimedia of virtual space.
Anokhin Yu.V., Baranov M.P. On the State's Ideological Function in Modern Virtual Space Conditions. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 14—24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.2
Bukhovets A. N. Ideologicheskaya funktsiya gosudarstva. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2002.
Democratic Party's computers breached by Russian hackers. Junе 14, 2016. Available at: https://apnews.com/c20489e1d97142e3bb570c5f72a87 517/democratic-partys-computersbreached-russian-hackers (accessed 07.09.2017).
Georgia loses the fight with Russia, but managed to win the PR war. The Times. 2008. 13 Aug.
Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security. Available at: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national (accessed 07.09.2017).
Khoruzhiy S. S. Rod ili ne rod? Zametki k ontologii virtualnosti. Voprosy filosofii, 1997, no. 6.
Kirik T. A. Virtualnaya realnost : sushchnost, kriterii, tipologiya. Cand. diss. Omsk, 2004.
Klikushina N. Yu. Ponyatie virtualnoy realnosti v kurse istorii i filosofii nauk. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 2009, no. 4.
Kovaleva N. N. Informatsionnoe pravo Rossii. Moscow, 2007.
Kurbaliyya Y. Upravlenie Internetom. Koordinatsionnyy tsentr natsionalnogo domena seti Internet. Moscow, 2010.
Nosov N. A. Virtualnaya realnost. Voprosy filosofii, 1999, no. 10.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Available at: http://iph.ras.ru/enc.htm.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Josh Earnest en route Greensboro, NC, 10/11/2016. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/10/11/press-gaggle-presssecretary-josh-earnest-en-route-greensboro-nc (accessed 22.12.2018).
Rassolov I. M. Pravo i Internet. Teoreticheskie problemy. Moscow, 2009.
Skandal s Telegram: kak SShA i Britaniya kontroliruyut svoi sotsseti. Available at: https://www.spb.kp.ru/daily/26696.5/3720551 (accessed 22.12.2018).
SShA narashchivayut kibersily. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-andcomments/analytics/ssha-narashchivayut-kibersily (accessed 06.09.2017).
Tsirlov V. L. Pravovye voprosy bezopasnosti kiberprostranstva v sisteme otechestvennykh normativnykh dokumentov. Pravovaya informatika, 2014, no. 2.
V Avstralii razrabotali zakonoproekt o dostupe k zashifrovannym messendzheram. Available at: https://ria.ru/world/20170714/1498473553.html (accessed 22.12.2018).
V FRG spetssluzhbam razreshili vzlamyvat messendzhery ne tolko dlya borby s terrorizmom. Available at: http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/4359798 (accessed 22.12.2018).
V Internet vveli kibervoyska. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3187320 (accessed 07.09.2017).
EK predlozhila oblegchit spetssluzhbam dostup k dannym v Internete dlya borby s terrorizmom. Available at: http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/5134739 (accessed 22.12.2018).
A. I. ABRAMOVA
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
The problem of by-law-making remains relevant for the domestic legal science and practice. This is due to a number of factors an important place among which is taken by the need to create a single internally consistent legal system of the Russian state, to increase the level of its functioning with regard to new realities. The topic of discussion within the framework of the problem under consideration both in the scientific community and in practice is the question of the relationship between laws and by-laws, their systemic communication; delimitation of the scope of legislative and by-law regulation, separation of a by-law from the general array of legal acts in the context of the continuing growth in the number of such acts, changing forms of their expression.
In the process of research the method of formal logical analysis, the systematic approach, the historical and comparative legal methods were used.
Analysis of various points of view on this issue allowed the author to reveal the essence and purpose of secondary legislation, to show the place and role of secondary regulation in the legal system of modern Russia. By-law-making is considered by the author as a function and the main form of implementation of the rule-making competence of the relevant body, official the limits of which are determined by the legislator on the basis of state policy in the field of organization of executive, judicial authority, local authority. The author comes to the conclusion that determining whether there is a need for by-laws is the most important condition for its objectification in the field of legal regulation of social relations, given the multi-purpose, multi-level nature of such regulation. It has a large and significant potential for the state and society, including the primary rule-making (norm-setting). The article analyzes the issues of optimization of by-law-making activity in Russia, identifies promising areas of its development.
law-making, by-laws, legal norms, law enforcement, forms of by-law-making, limits of by-law regulation.
Abramova A.I. By-law-making in the Modern Understanding: Realities and Prospects. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 25—35. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.3
Avakyan S. A. Probely i defekty v konstitutsionnom prave i puti ikh ustraneniya. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2007, no. 8.
Bobylev A. I. Sovremennoe tolkovanie sistemy prava i sistemy zakonodatelstva. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1998, no. 2.
Guk P. A. Sudebnoe normotvorchestvo: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Lex Russica, 2016, no. 7.
Ivanov S. A. Sootnoshenie zakona i podzakonnogo normativnogo pravovogo akta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Moscow, 2002.
Kazantsev S. M. Proverka podzakonnykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov Konstitutsionnym Sudom Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, 2015, no. 1.
Konstitutsiya, zakon, podzakonnyy akt. Ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov. Moscow, 1994.
Kozhevnikov V. V. Delegirovannoe zakonotvorchestvo: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt. Sovremennoe pravo, 2016, no. 10.
Kozlova Ye. I., Kutafin O. Ye. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. Moscow, 2009.
Kuchin M. V. Formy sudebnogo normotvorchestva. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2018, no. 3.
Mikheeva I. V. Russian Lawmaking: Traditional Aspects of the History. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2010, no. 10, pp. 98—105. (In Russ.)
Mitskevich A. V. Sistema prava i sistema zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva. Ed. by V. S. Nersesyants. Moscow, 2002.
Pashentsev D. A. Russian Legislative Tradition: Ontology of the Process. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 8, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.)
Pigolkin A. S., Studenikina M. S. Zakonodatelstvo: ponyatie, osnovnye cherty, dinamika razvitiya. Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo: problemy i perspektivy. Moscow, 1995.
Polenina S. V. Nauchnye osnovy opredeleniya predmeta pravovogo regulirovaniya. Zakonotvorcheskaya tekhnika sovremennoy Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, sovershenstvovanie. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2001.
Proekt federalnogo zakona “O normativnykh pravovykh aktakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” (initsiativnyy zakonoproekt). Moscow: Institut zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2013.
Prokopovich G. A. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v sovremennom ponimanii: realii i perspektivy. Rossiyskiy sudya, 2015, no. 5.
Rumyantsev M. B. Podzakonnoe pravotvorchestvo: priznaki i vidy. Sovremennoe pravo, 2017, no. 2.
Skuratov D. Yu. Otdelnye problemy uchastiya Prezidenta RF v pravotvorcheskom protsesse. Moscow, 2007.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Ed. by A. V. Malko. Moscow, 2012.
N. M. KOLOSOVA
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the study of restrictions of constitutional rights and freedoms in the context of the direct effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The position is expressed in accordance with which federal law must comply with the wording established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation when there is the stipulated in part 3 of Art. 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation restriction of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen. Scientific debates on the relationship between the categories of “limiting and depriving human rights” are considered. Humiliation, as well as denial of rights, is only one of the forms or methods of their restriction as a constitutional value. Accordingly, the requirements of part 3 of Art. 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation are applicable not only to restriction, but also to derogation or denial of the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen.
Examples include electoral rights and the right to life. It is concluded that deprivation of rights is an extreme form of limitation. The relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation are analyzed. Thus, the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 19, 2016 No. 12-P was considered according to which the federal legislator is entitled to provide for other restrictive conditions for the exercise of voting rights to the extent necessary to protect the foundations of the constitutional order, morality, health rights and legitimate interests of other persons, to ensure the defense of the country and the security of the state.
It is concluded that the powers of the legislator are limited to the direct effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the framework of ensuring the direct effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the electoral rights of citizens of the Russian Federation could be further limited solely in order to achieve the goals stipulated by part 3 of Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. One of these goals is the elimination from the electoral list of citizens of the Russian Federation who can distort the collective will of the people.
direct effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, deprivation of rights, restriction of rights, impairment of rights, cancellation of rights, denial of rights, right to life, suspension of rights, electoral rights, genomic research, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Kolosova N.M. Direct Action of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Restriction of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen in the Context of Judicial Practice. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 36—47. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.4
Ebzeev B. S. A man, people, state in the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2005. 574 p. (In Russ.)
Ebzeev B. S. Introduction to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2012. 560 p. (In Russ.)
Khabrieva T. Y. Constitution as Basis of Legality in the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 3, pp. 3—11. (In Russ.)
Khabrieva T. Y., Chirkin V. Ye. The theory of the modern constitution. Moscow, 2005. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Kondrashev A. A. Limitations of constitutional rights in the Russian Federation: theoretical approaches and political-law practice. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2014, no. 7, pp. 40—47. (In Russ.)
Kravets I. A. Human Dignity: Dialogue of Theory, Constitutional Norms, International Regulators and Social Reality. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 111—128. (In Russ.)
Lapaeva V. V. Criteria of restriction of human rights from positions of libertarian notion feeling for law and order. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 4, pp. 103—115. (In Russ.)
Lapaeva V. V. Problem of limitation of the human rights in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2005, no. 7, pp. 13—23. (In Russ.)
Lazarev V. V. Limitation of the Right by Judicial Decisions. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 6, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.)
Lazarev V. V. Limitations of Rights and Freedoms as Theoretical and Practical Questions. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 9, pp. 35—47. (In Russ.)
The commentary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Ed. by V. D. Karpovich. Moscow, 2002. 959 p. (In Russ.)
Vitruk N. V. The general theory of a legal status of the individual. Moscow, 2008. 448 p. (In Russ.)
Yagofarova I. D. The main characteristics of the restriction of human rights and freedoms: theoretical and legal aspect. Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2002, no. 4, pp. 4—10. (In Russ.)
A. V. SALENKO
Law Institute, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad 236016, Russian Federation
A new term has appeared in the Russian domestic legislation on the freedom of peaceful assembly - the involvement of minors into unauthorized public events. The author provides a critical analysis of this legal concept and tries to answer the question to what extent this novel corresponds to international and national constitutional law, which explicitly guarantees minors' right to freedom of peaceful assembly.
This article systematically reviews the current issues related to participation of minors in public protest actions, including the first case in Russia occurred in Kaliningrad regarding involvement of minors into unauthorized picketing. The author suggests to improve Russian law on public assembly, particularly follow-up revision of the mechanism for bringing to responsibility in cases when minors are involved into unauthorized public events.
In the study the author uses the traditional research methods such as analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, logic and comparative legal methods.
Based on the analysis of legal provisions prohibiting the involvement of minors into unauthorized public actions, the author concludes that the quality of law is low due to the fact that the legislator uses a legal technique of “point bans” - haphazardly and selectively imposing bans on the “involvement of minors” merely into certain administrative offences. Thus, as a result, the law provides excessive and disproportionate administrative responsibility (a fine of 50 000 Rubles - 700 EUR) for involving children into unauthorized but peaceful public events; and, at the same time, the federal legislator “punishes” the involvement of minors into alcohol and tobacco consumption with a symbolic fine of 3000 Rubles (40 EUR). The author represents the opinion that there is a strong need to introduce a general ban on the involvement of minors into any administrative offences, and also favours modification of the Art. 20.2 (11) of the Russian Code of Administrative Violations (RCAV), which would supplement the sanction of this norm with the possibility to issue a warning and cancel the lower limit of the fine. These measures can guarantee the proportional nature of administrative responsibility and judges can truly be able to individualize the administrative punishment taking into account all relevant circumstances in the particular case where minors are involved.
children, minors, the involvement of children into unauthorized public events, unauthorized picketing, freedom of artistic expression, artistic protest, photo session, performance, public events, rallies, demonstrations, marches, pickets, meetings, freedom of peaceful assembly, the right of public assembly.
Salenko A.V. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly: “Children's Meetings” and “Adult Sanctions”. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 48—61. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.5
Alisultanova A. V. In St. Petersburg, Activists cut the Constitution of the Russian Federation as a Picture of the Free Artist Banksy. Available at: http://www.sobaka.ru/city/city/80043 (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Avakyan S. A. Democracy of Protest Relations: Constitutional Dimension. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2012, no. 1, pp. 3—17. (In Russ.)
Avdeev D. A. Legal Voice of Political Will of Russian Citizens, or Modern Problems of Public Events. Sovremennoe pravo, 2018, no. 12, pp. 29—32. (In Russ.)
Didn't they kick you?: as the Kaliningrader was judged for the Involvement of the Teenagers into the Picket. Available at: https://www.newkaliningrad.ru/news/community/22676898-nebili-vas-nogami-kak-sudili-kaliningradtsa-za-vovlechenie-podrostkov-v-piket.html (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Dolzhikov A. V. Is the Glass half-empty or half-full? Interference as a Form of Constitutional Rights Limitation. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, 2018, no. 1, pp. 80—112. (In Russ.)
Dolzhikov A. V. The Effect of the Proportionality Principle in the Field of Constitutional Institutional Law. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya, 2018, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 29—36. (In Russ.)
Fomicheva O. A. Meeting and other Public Events as a Form of Legislative Activity. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2018, no. 10, pp. 48—51. (In Russ.)
In Russia, the first Case of the Involvement of Minors into Meetings was formally opened. Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2019/02/12/under_age/ (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Ivanova K. A. Meetings, walks, demonstration, picketing as a mechanism for the implementation of the public initiatives by the population. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2015, no. 4, pp. 106—113. (In Russ.)
Karasev A. T., Zhilina M. L. Some theoretical aspects of the limitation of political rights. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Uralskiy region, 2010, no. 1, pp. 8—13. (In Russ.)
Kokotov A. N. Law of the constitution in the Russian Law. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2014, no. 10, pp. 2161—2168. (In Russ.)
Kolmakov S. Yu. Freedom of Assembly in the Practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Vestnik RUDN: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215—248. (In Russ.)
Krasnov M. A. Limitation of Human Rights or Search of its Natural Bounds? Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2009, no. 2, pp. 103—115. (In Russ.)
Kustikova A., Romanov S. And everything else can go to hell. St. Petersburg activist was fined 160 thousand rubles for the painting "Nine stages of degeneration of the leader". Available at: https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2018/06/08/76760-hot-trava-ne-rasti (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Nelyubin N. One public action for the price of three: triple fines for “minor meetings”. Available at: https://www.fontanka.ru/2018/12/18/140/ (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Nesmeyanova S. E. Interrelation of International and National Law. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 1999, no. 3, pp. 50—55. (In Russ.)
Nesmeyanova S. E. Revisiting the Hierarchy of Constitutional Values. Legal Concept, 2017, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 71—74. (In Russ.)
Nesmeyanova S. E., Kolobaeva N. E. Constitutional Restriction of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms. Rossiyskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka, 2018, no. 3, pp. 9—16. (In Russ.)
Paper Shredding Machine in the Picture: Experts on the Legal Consequences of the Destruction of Banksy's work. Available at: http://rapsinews.ru/incident_publication/20181010/2888 55984.html (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Pushkarskaya A. Art requires Rights. The ECtHR was asked to protect the Freedom of artistic Protest in the Russian Federation. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3938810 (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
Report of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation “On Observance of the Constitutional Right to Peaceful Assembly in the Russian Federation”. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2007, June 28, no. 136. (In Russ.)
Riekkinen M. A. Restricted Political Rights of Minors: Theoretical and Legal Foundations, International Standards and Experience of the Russian Federation. Lex Russica, 2016, no. 2, pp. 29—39. (In Russ.)
Rudenko V. N. "Pure Democracy" and its Attributes. Sibirskiy filosofskiy zhurnal, 2012, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 120—126. (In Russ.)
Salat O. The Right to Freedom of Assembly. A Comparative Study. Oxford and Portland; Oregon, 2015.
Salikov M. S. International Law and Protection of Human Rights by the Russian Constitutional Court. Problemy prava, 2003, no. 1, pp. 80—95. (In Russ.)
The Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Europe. Nomos. Ed. by A. Peters, I. Ley. Baden-Baden, 2016.
The Public Authorities restrict the Freedom of Assembly in Russia. Press Release by the Registrar of the European Court of Human Rights (unofficial translation). ECHR 053 (2017) 07.02.2017. Available at: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-5621965-7111249. (In Russ.)
Vasilev V. The Art Group “Voina“ (War): Art or Hooliganism? Available at: https://www.golos-ameriki.ru/a/vv-art-on-the-edge-2011-02-21-116607788/213396.html (accessed 11.06.2019). (In Russ.)
T. S. YATSENKO
Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russian Federation
The investor protection issue in crowdfunding is of particular relevance due to the growing number of crowdfunding platforms in Russia, whose activities are still not regulated. However, the peculiarity of crowdfunding and the specifics of the conditions for its implementation increase the risk of losses for investors also in result of unfair actions taken by individuals attracting investments. In this regard, it is necessary to develop an adequate system of measures to protect the rights and interests of investors, which would take into account the importance of supporting crowdfunding as a growing investment activity and at the same time, prevent abuses in this area.
The purpose of the article is to study the main areas of crowdfunding investor protection proposed in the Draft Federal Law No. 419090-7 “On Attracting Investments Using Investment Platforms” and evaluating its effectiveness with due account of foreign experience.
To achieve the required theoretical result, the article uses such general scientific methods as analysis, induction, and deduction. The composition of the particular scientific methods includes a comparative analysis and a systematic approach to the study of the problem.
The study led to the conclusion that the focus on informing the investor and limiting the amount of this investment, which is made in the Russian draft law following foreign legislation, is not a sufficient measure to ensure the rights and interests of investors in crowdfunding and requires the development of additional security tools, which would take into account, among other things, the features of certain investment methods, including the acquisition of digital rights.
crowdfunding, investing activities, investor, crowdlending, crowdinvesting, protection of rights, security, digital right, token.
Yatsenko T.S. The Problem of Protection of Rights of Investors in Crowdfunding: Investment Risks and Ways to Overcome Them. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 62—71. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.6
Bradford C. S. Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 2012, no. 1, pp. 1—150.
Drobyshev P. Russian crowdfunding. Projects of regulation of crowdfunding activity. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/03/05/rossijskij_kraudfanding _proekty_regulirovaniya_kraudfandingovoj_deyatelnosti (accessed 19.04.2019). (In Russ.)
Fairfield J. BitProperty. Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper, 2014, no. 17, pp. 1—72.
Gurrea-Martinez A., Remolina N. The Law and Finance of Initial Coin Offerings. Ibero-American Institute for Law and Finance Working Paper, 2018, no. 4. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3182261 (accessed 12.04.2019).
Guznov A., Mikheeva L., Novoselova L., Avakyan Ye. et al. Digital assets in the system of civil law objects. Zakon, 2018, no. 5, pp. 16—38. (In Russ.)
Hazen T. L. Crowdfunding or Fraudfunding? Social Networks and the Securities Laws — Why the Specially Tailored Exemption Must be Conditioned on Meaningful Disclosure. North Carolina Law Review, 2012, vol. 90, pp. 1735—1769.
Jeng D. The JOBS Act: Rule 506, Crowdfunding, and the Balance between Efficient Capital Formation and Investor Protection. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238624 (accessed 03.05.2019).
Klinov A. O. The legal regulation of crowdfunding in Russia and foreign jurisdictions. Zakon, 2018, no. 2, pp. 90—105. (In Russ.)
Laptev V. A. Digital assets as objects of the civil rights. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2018, no. 2, pp. 199—204. (In Russ.)
Mollick E. R. The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 1—16.
Polyakova V. E. Crowdfunding: concept, legal regulation and contractual structures (access from SPS “Consultant Plus”). (In Russ.)
Rohr J., Wright A. Blockchain-Based Token Sales, Initial Coin Offerings, and the Democratization of Public Capital Markets. University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper, 2017, no. 338. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048104 (accessed 03.05.2019).
O. V. GUTNIKOV
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
Incorporating corporate relations in the subject of civil law makes it possible to pick out a special corporate liability in civil law relations. At the same time, the system of corporate liability measures, that reflects the corporate relations' specifics, remains undeveloped in legislation and civil law doctrine.
The purpose of the research is to justify the composition, content and main features of corporate liability measures in civil law. In this case, the task is to consider the theoretical basis to highlight the special sanctions of corporate liability, to identify their composition and content in the context of the basic principles of corporate liability, including the principle of specialty.
The methodological basis of the study is general research methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, the method of system analysis) and methods of legal science (including methods of comparative law, literal, systematic, teleological and historical interpretation of legal norms).
As a result of the research, conclusions are drawn about the essential specificity of the composition and procedure for applying corporate liability measures in comparison with general sanctions of liability in civil law. In particular, it is substantiated that this specificity is due to the non-proprietary nature of the rights and duties, which violation causes initiate measures for corporate liability. This specificity is manifested both in non-material corporate sanctions, which are basic for corporate liability, and in special property measures of liability. A special system of measures of property and non-property liability in corporate law is proposed. It has been established that the main feature of property sanctions in corporate law is the principle of specialty, according to which the recovery of damages and other corporate liability measures can take place only in cases expressly provided by law. The features of the sanctions of corporate liability for committing a corporate tort are substantiated. The article reveals how the size of corporate liability sanctions depends on the volume of administrative corporate rights belonging to the violator.
legal entities, civil liability, corporate liability, corporate offenses, corporate relations, corporate torts, measures of corporate liability.
Gutnikov O.V. Special Measures of Civil Liability in Corporate Law as a Basic Characteristics of Corporate Liability. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 72—84. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.7
Braginskiy M. I., Vitryanskiy V. V. Contract Law: General Provisions. Moscow, 1997. 682 p. (In Russ.)
Corporate Law. Ed. by I. S. Shitkina. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2018. 990 p. (In Russ.)
Gutnikov O. V. Corporate Liability in Civil Law. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 3. pp. 39—52. (In Russ.)
Gutnikov O. V. Corporate Liability in Civil Law. Moscow, 2019. 488 p. (In Russ.)
Ioffe O. S. Law of Obligations. Moscow, 1975. 880 p. (In Russ.)
Ioffe O. S. Liability under Soviet Civil Law. In Ioffe O. S. Selected Works: Vol. I: Legal Relationship under Soviet Civil Law. Liability under Soviet Civil Law. St. Petersburg, 2003. Pp. 94—572. (In Russ.)
Krasheninnikov Ye. A. The Concept of Civil Liability. Vestnik VAS RF, 2012, no. 5, pp. 6—11. (In Russ.)
Leyst O. E. Sanctions and Liability under Soviet Law. Moscow, 1981. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Losses and Practice of their Compensation. Ed. by M. A. Rozhkova. Moscow, 2006. 622 p. (In Russ.)
Sadikov O. N. Losses in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2009. 221 p. (In Russ.)
Sinitsyn S. A. The Right to the Dividend: Risks, Contents, Implementation and Protection. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, 2018, no. 4, pp. 91—131. (In Russ.)
A. A. GRAVINA
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russia
Business crime prevention is determined by a free development of business. The lack of security for the property of businessmen and the lack of their personal security is a real problem which slows down business development in the country. There is always a risk of losing business due to the raider attacks and bringing criminal charges against businessmen. The 2010 Concept of modernizing criminal law in the field of business activity, developed under the order of the Russian President, determines these factors as the main reasons preventing entrepreneurs from investing into businesses, promoting capital outflow and as the result - obstacles for legal business activity arise.
The goal in this research is to analyze the above reasons and find out the solutions based on humanization of criminal law.
The methodological basis of the study is the dialectical materialist method, which studies phenomena in their totality, taking into account interrelations and dependencies. General scientific and special legal research methods, comparative legal and system research methods are used.
It is possible to stimulate the return of entrepreneurs to a legal business only by creating legal guarantees for ensuring business within law. Unjustified criminalization, the constant danger of losing a business as a result of criminal charges that impede legitimate business activities, identifies the main directions of criminal policy based on the principles of humanism. The result of humanization is the adoption of criminal law measures that create difficulties for raider seizures of property. There is also a need to establish criminal liability for unlawful initiation of criminal proceedings, if it is committed in order to prevent business activities. The real measure of free business activity is the addition to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation norms exempting entrepreneurs from criminal liability. The Federal laws adopted on 12/27/2018 create additional real guarantees stimulating business activities within the law.
humanization of criminal law, business, the 2010 Concepts of modernizing criminal law in economic field, raiders attacks, protection of property, personal protection of entrepreneurs, releasing businessmen form criminal charges, specifics of bringing criminal charges against businessmen.
Gravina A. A. Humanization of Criminal Law and Its Role in Preventing Crimes in the Field of Entrepreneurship. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 85—95. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.8
Baranov V. M. Legal errors in the sphere of legislative and law enforcement regulation of the economy. The effectiveness of legislation in the economic sphere: scientific and practical research. Ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov. Moscow, 2010. 384 p. (In Russ.)
Citizen, law and public authority. Moscow, 2005. 367 p. (In Russ.)
Crime and offences (2013—2017). Moscow, 2018. 172 p. (In Russ.)
Denisov S. Depenalization and retroactive force of law. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012, no. 5, pp. 49—50. (In Russ.)
Kashepov V. P. Conceptions of the Development of Criminal Legislation. Concept of development of the Russian legislation. Ed. by T. Y. Khabrieva, Yu. A. Tikhomirov. Moscow, 2010. Pp. 273—300. (In Russ.)
Kharitonov A. N. Legal regulation of counteraction to raiding. Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2015, no. 1, pp. 37—42. (In Russ.)
Koshaeva T. O. The impact of criminalization and decriminalization on the modernization of a Special section of Russian criminal law. Criminalization and decriminalization as a form of transformation of criminal legislation. Ed. by V. P. Kashepov. Moscow, 2018. Pp. 180—199. (In Russ.)
The Humanization of the Modern Criminal Law. Ed. by V. P. Kashepov. Moscow, 2015. 336 p. (In Russ.)
Truntsevskiy Yu. V. Criminal law problems of violations of legislation in the field of economic activity. VII joint Russian-German round table “Economic Crimes: Russian and European experience”. Moscow, 2016. Pp. 73—76. (In Russ.)
I. V. DEMENTEV
Central Branch, Russian State University of Justice, Voronezh 394006, Russian Federation
The administrative and judicial practice of recent years indicates the expansion of the discretionary beginnings of tax enforcement. This is contrary to the traditional law enforcement paradigm. In the course of tax enforcement new forms of legal activity (a contract) are actively used, and the interpretation of civil legal concepts and terms is carried out in a special fiscal regime. Tax law enforcement is characterized by the expansion of judicial discretion by securing in the tax legislation or judicial practice the so-called general anti-incrimination rule. A new tax law enforcement paradigm is causing increased uncertainty and unpredictability. Tax enforcement becomes context-sensitive, prognostic. Tax authorities and courts constantly propose different solutions depending on the facts and circumstances of each specific situation and the current political and socio-economic situation.
The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the specifics of tax enforcement in order to confirm or refute the hypothesis of changing the traditional paradigm of tax enforcement. The objectives of the study are the analysis of judicial practice in the application of tax and legal norms, the identification of contractual elements in tax law enforcement, the determination of the boundaries of administrative and judicial discretion, and the mutual influence of tax and civil legislation on tax law enforcement.
During the study analysis and synthesis, comparison, formal legal method, forecasting were used.
The study confirmed the hypothesis of a change in the traditional model of tax enforcement. The dependence of tax enforcement on judicial interpretation, the expansion of discretionary principles and judicial discretion, the use of civil law institutions in a special tax regime to achieve the objectives of tax enforcement are revealed. The negative trend of growing uncertainty, contextual dependence of tax enforcement has been noted.
tax enforcement, unjustified tax benefit, judicial doctrines, administrative discretion, judicial discretion, dispositive legal regulation, civil law determination.
Dementev I.V. Tax Enforcement: The Change of Paradigm. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 96—106. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.9
Actual problems of the theory of state and law. Ed. by V. D. Perevalov. Moscow, 2019. 440 p. (In Russ.)
Alibekov S. T. On the formation of the legal paradigm of independence of Kazakhstan. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatelstva Respubliki Kazakhstan, 2016, no. 4, pp. 36—43. (In Russ.)
Arakelov S. A. Anti-evasive norms in international practice. New legislative instruments to combat tax evasion in Russia. Zakon, 2018, no. 5, pp. 109—115. (In Russ.)
Boshno S. V. Theory of State and Law. Moscow, 2018. 408 p. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Actual problems of the tax enforcement mechanism. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2017, no. 2, pp. 12—18. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Competence issues of tax authorities in the context of Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2017 No. 9-P. Finansovoe pravo, 2018, no. 1, pp. 33-37. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Contractual relations in the tax law of Russia. The ratio of public and private in the legal regulation of financial and related economic relations. Moscow, 2012. Pp. 140—149. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Individual (non-normative) tax legal acts. Moscow, 2006. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Power subjects of tax enforcement. Pravoprimenenie. 2017, no. 2, pp. 94—99. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Prooving and evidence in tax enforcement. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, 2018 (Spetsialnyy vypusk), pp. 252—260. (In Russ.)
Dementev I. V. Tax enforcement as a form of implementation of tax law. Finansovoe pravo, 2013, no. 6, pp. 21—24. (In Russ.)
Demin A. V. Dispozitivnost i nalogooblozhenie: kommentariy zakonodatelstva i praktiki nalogovogo administrirovaniya. (access from SPS “Consultant Plus”). 2017.
Denisenko V. V., Sukhinin A. Yu. Soviet normativism as a theoretical and legal paradigm. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 380—395. (In Russ.)
General Theory of State and Law. Vol. 2: Law: Academic Course. Ed. by M. N. Marchenko. 4th ed. Moscow, 2013. 816 p. (In Russ.)
Karaseva (Sentsova) M. V. Civil law enforcement measures in the tax area and protection of the rights of taxpayers. Finansovoe pravo, 2017, no. 10, pp. 27—31. (In Russ.)
Karaseva (Sentsova) M. V. Civil-law determination of tax law: the concept and manifestations. Tax and budget law: modern problems of property relations. Ed. by M. V. Karaseva (Sentsova). Voronezh, 2012. Pp. 199—205. (In Russ.)
Karaseva M. V. Financial relationship. Moscow, 2001. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Karaseva M. V. The decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2017 No. 9-P in the “mirror” of tax law. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, 2018, no. 2, pp. 14—17. (In Russ.)
Kleandrov M. I. Judicial discretion. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, 2007, no. 6, pp. 4—16. (In Russ.)
Kun T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow, 1975. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Kuparashvili M. D. The concept of a paradigm in modern thinking. Bulletin of the Omsk University, 2003, no. 3, pp. 50—52. (In Russ.)
Malko A. V. et al. Theory of state and law in questions and answers. Moscow, 2018. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Markov P. V. Law and discretion: legal and legal discretion. Trudy IGP RAN. 2011, no. 2, pp. 34—42. (In Russ.)
Mikhaylova O. R. Methods of limiting the discretion of tax authorities in the implementation of tax control. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2005, no. 7, pp. 90—96. (In Russ.)
Petrova G. V. General theory of tax law. Moscow, 2004. 224 p. (In Russ.)
Pudelka Y. The concept of discretion in administrative law of Germany and its delimitation from judicial discretion. Vestnik SPbGU. Pravo, 2017, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 443—451. (In Russ.)
Smolitskaya Ye. Ye. Losses and unjust enrichment in the tax sphere (based on court practice). Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2015, no. 11, pp. 125—130. (In Russ.)
Solovey Yu. P. Judicial review of administrative discretion. Yezhegodnik publichnogo prava — 2015: Administrativnyy protsess. Moscow, 2015. Pp. 280—289. (In Russ.)
Starykh Yu. V. Tax enforcement discretion. Ed. by M. V. Karaseva. Moscow, 2007. 150 p. (In Russ.)
Tax law. Ed. by S. G. Pepelyaev. Moscow, 2000. 343 p. (In Russ.)
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Public Law: Falls and Ups. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1996, no. 1, pp. 3—11. (In Russ.)
Vinnitskiy D. V. International tax law: problems of theory and practice. Moscow, 2017. 463 p. (In Russ.)
Yelchaninov V. A. The importance of paradigms in scientific knowledge. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 2-2, pp. 203—205. (In Russ.)
Yerokhina Yu. V. Synergetic research paradigm of the international legal sphere. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2014, no. 4, pp. 19—29. (In Russ.)
A. V. KALMYKOVA, P. P. KABYTOV
A. V. KALMYKOVA, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
P. P. KABYTOV, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
Domestic public administration is increasingly resorting to the practice of borrowing methods of corporate management. The past implementation of the project management method led to the formation of specific organizational structures in the apparatus of public administration. In management, such structures are characterized as "flexible" because they are characterized by sufficient discretion to perform tasks. However, in public administration, initiative and discretion are limited by a strict legal framework, accountability to higher public authorities and society, a special regime of spending the budget allocated for the implementation of the project structures.
The purpose of the study is to reveal the legal nature of the new structures implementing the method of project management, to assess the consequences of the introduction of corporate management approaches in the state legal matter.
The objectives of the study is to analyze the regulatory legal regulation of project activities and the legal status of the project management bodies, to assess how constructively passed their adaptation.
To achieve the goals and objectives of the study used including formal-legal, formal-logical methods, method of interpretation of law, as well as General scientific methods.
According to the results of the study the authors come to the conclusion that a special (simplified) legal regime is being built for the management bodies of project activities to exercise public functions and powers. Proposals for its final formation are formulated. The conclusion is made about the need to strengthen the legal status of officials involved in the management and implementation of the project. Attention is drawn to the risks of delegating legislative authority to representatives of the business community who are participants in a project as part of project management.
public administration, flexible structures, project management, project office.
Kalmykova A.V., Kabytov P.P. “Flexible” Structures of Public Administration. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 107—120. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.10
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Moscow, 2017. 586 p. (In Russ.)
Administrative reform in Russia. Ed. by S. Ye. Naryshkin, T. Y. Khabrieva. Moscow, 2006. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Afanasev V. G. Scientific management of society. (Experience of system research). Moscow, 1968. 391 p. (In Russ.)
Bobylev A. I., Gorshkova N. G., Ivakin V. I. Executive power in Russia: theory and practice of its implementation. Moscow, 2003. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Executive power in Russia. History and present, problems and prospects of development. Moscow, 2004. 568 p. (In Russ.)
Executive power in the Russian Federation. Development problem. Ed. by I. L. Bachilo. Moscow, 1998. 431 p. (In Russ.)
Executive power in the Russian Federation. Ed. by A. F. Nozdrachev, Yu. A. Tikhomirov. Moscow, 1996. 269 p. (In Russ.)
Kalinin A. M. Realization of program-target instruments at the federal level: analysis, problems and prospects. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya, 2017, no. 2, pp. 151—164. (In Russ.)
Kulikova Ye. Ye. Risk management. Innovative aspect. Moscow, 2008. 112 p. (In Russ.)
Legal support of public administration and Executive power. Ed. by S. A. Starostin. Moscow, 2017. 335 p. (In Russ.)
Mikhalev Ye. O. Prerequisites and instruments for network organizational structures formation. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 352, pp. 153—156. (In Russ.)
Mikhnenko P. A. Management theory. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2014. 640 p. (In Russ.)
Nozdrachev A. F. Administrative reform: Russian version. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika, 2005, no. 8—9, pp. 9—21. (In Russ.)
Nozdrachev A. F. Modern Contents of the Theory “Administrative and Legal Regime”. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 2, pp. 98—110. (In Russ.)
Osipov V. S. Project-functional structure of management for public administration. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya, 2016, no. 3, pp. 219—230. (In Russ.)
Polozhikhina M. A. Organization of public administration in modern Russia: structure, technologies, estimates. Moscow, 2012. 294 p. (In Russ.)
Ponkin I. V. Theory of public administration: the instruments of public administration and public policy. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2014, no. 1, pp. 27—30. (In Russ.)
Popov L. L., Migachev Yu. I., Tikhomirov S. V. Public administration and Executive power: content and ratio. Ed. by L. L. Popov. Moscow, 2011. 319 p. (In Russ.)
Tambovtsev V. L. State regulation of the state: theory, international experience, Russian reforms. Moscow, 2004. 36 p. (In Russ.)
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Effects of legal acts: assessment and correction. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya, 2010, no. 3, pp. 140—148. (In Russ.)
Toffler O. Adaptive Corporation. Novaya industrialnaya volna na Zapade. Moscow, 1999. Pp. 448—465. (In Russ.)
Vladimirova I. G. Organizational structures of company management. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 1998, no. 5, pp. 91—103. (In Russ.)
V. M. ZHUYKOV, M. O. DOLOVA
V. M. ZHUYKOV, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
M. O. DOLOVA, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
The article deals with some problems of modern civil procedure, including the problems and future of unification of judicial legislation. The Federal Law of November 28, 2018 No. 451-FZ "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation", additions and changes in the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, Commercial Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation are analyzed. It is noted that there is a conceptual "gap" between civil and administrative procedures, which is hardly overcome by the amendments. The changes in legislation imply the division of cases, the joint trial of which in most cases is preferable, or the administrative procedure without any specifics just in the ordinary way. Nevertheless, it is noted that such a legislative decision is more preferable than refusal to accept the claim or the termination of the procedure, which block the further trial. This approach indicates attempts to harmonize civil and administrative procedures.
The authors systematize the latest reforms of procedural legislation and identify several main areas that indicate the trend of unification of legal proceedings. Moreover the ways of further unification of civil procedural legislation are offered. In the light of the judicial reform in Russian Federation and the amendments to the procedural codes unreasonable differences in the regulation of similar issues, including the stages and procedures for the review of judicial acts, are revealed.
civil procedure, commercial procedure, administrative procedure, unification of procedural legislation, judicial system.
Zhuykov V.M., Dolova M.O. Current Problems of Unification of Procedural Legislation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 121—135. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.11
Baulin O. V., Nosyreva Ye. I., Filchenko D. G., Shemeneva O. N. Types of civil procedure. Moscow, 2012. 280 p. (In Russ.)
Bonner A. T. Administrative procedure in the Russian Federation: myth or reality? (or a dispute between processualist and administrativist). Zakon. 2016, no. 7. pp. 11—53. (In Russ.)
Borisova Ye. A. Appeal, cassation, supervision on civil cases. Moscow, 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Branovitskiy K. L. Approximation of civil procedural law in the European Union and in the post-Soviet space (comparative legal aspect). Dr. diss. Yekaterinburg, 2019. 447 p. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N. A. Civil Procedure Simplification as a Sign of Tendency to Its Unification. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2016, no. 9, pp. 3—6. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N. A. Differentiation, unification and simplification in civil procedure. Moscow, 2010. 264 p. (In Russ.)
Kleyn N. I. Comparative analysis of the norms of the Russian Federation codes of civil procedure and of commercial (“arbitrazh”) procedure on the production of the cases arising from administrative and other public relations. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2013, no. 3, pp. 8—18. (In Russ.)
Prikhodko I. A., Bondarenko A. V., Stolyarenko V. M. Reform of procedural legislation: goals, problems, trends. Moscow, 2018. 624 p. (In Russ.)
Problems of development of Russian procedural law. Ed. by V. M. Zhuykov. Moscow, 2016. 224 pp. (In Russ.)
Sakhnova T. V. Administrative Judicial Procedure: Problems of Self-Identification. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess, 2016, no. 9—10, pp. 35—40. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V. M. Categories of reality possibility in civil procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2016, no. 6, pp. 10—32. (In Russ.)
Zhuykov V. M. On Some Issues of Development of Procedural Legislation and Judicial System Legislation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 8, pp. 135—150. (In Russ.)
A. I. SIDORENKO
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
The article is dedicated to the questions which arise in judicial practice in cases concerning protection of intellectual property. The problem of modern legal regulation of intellectual property is formulated as the necessity of determination by courts of just balance between the interests of holders of intellectual property rights and public access to the information. The overview of cases considered under the Chapter 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is presented, which contain the evaluation of certain aspects of application of digital technologies in legal relations from both material and procedural perspectives. A procedure for proving the use of counterfeit programs as a combination of databases and installation distributions has been determined; the procedural role of the domain administrator is defined in cases of infringement of intellectual property rights in the Internet as well as an additional circle of responsible entities: the site owner, hosting provider, domain registrar, search engine operator; the prospect of introducing the practice of refusing to protect a database compiled as a by-product of the organization's activities is evaluated; the problem of correlating the simultaneous publication of the result of intellectual activity in the State party to the Rome International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations of October 26, 1961 and the publication of such an outcome of intellectual activity on the Internet was raised. The application of evidences obtained on the Internet in cases concerning intellectual property rights in comparison with other categories of cases is also reviewed. As a tool of development of intellectual property rights it is proposed to use by courts the approaches to interpretation of laws, which guarantee taking into consideration the economic interests of participants of legal relations based on balance of interests of persons involved in use of intellectual property.
intellectual property, digitalization, judicial protection of rights, digital evidences, interpretation of law.
Sidorenko A.I. Judicial Protection of Intellectual Rights in the Digital Age. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 136—147. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.12
Balkin J. The Path of Robotics Law. California Law Review Circuit, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 45—60.
Chukovskaya E. E., Proksh M. Yu. Use of Results of Creative Activity in the Internet: a Possible Approach for the Regulation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 14—22. (In Russ.)
Drapezo R. G., Shelestyukov V. N. Peculiarities of the Use of Results of an Intelligence Operation Computer Information Acquisition. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2018, no. 9, pp. 65—72. (In Russ.)
Dzhordan D. Robots. Moscow, 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.)
Entin V. L. Copyright in Virtual Reality (New Opportunities and Challenges of the Digital Era). Moscow, 2017. 216 p. (In Russ.)
Folding shelves. E-books mean a plot twist for public libraries and publishers. Available at: https://www.economist.com/international/2013/03/23/ folding-shelves.
Gavrilov E. P. Intellectual Property Law of the Russian Federation: Legislation and Doctrine. Patenty i litsenzii, 2018, no. 8, pp. 14—20. (In Russ.)
Golubtsov V. G. Electronic Evidence in the Context of E-Justice. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2019, no. 1, pp. 170—188. (In Russ.)
Nakhova Ye. A. The Problems of Using Electronic Evidence in Civil Litigation and Administrative Law Proceedings. Zakon, 2018, no. 4, pp. 81—90. (In Russ.)
Pobedonostsev K. P. The Course of Civil Law. Part I. Moscow, 2004. 800 p. (In Russ.)
Samolysov P. V. Electronic Evidence in Antitrust Cases. Pravo i ekonomika, 2016, no. 5, pp. 58—65. (In Russ.)
The music man. A New York court rules that the “first sale doctrine” does not apply to digital media. Available at: https://www.economist.com/schumpeter/2013/04/02/the-music-man?zid=317&ah=8a47fc455a44945580198 768fad0fa41.
Voynikanis Ye. A. The Paradigm Approach in Intellectual Property Rights Researches. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2017. 387 p. (In Russ.)
Zarubina M. N., Pavlov A. A. On Procedural Realities and Potential Possibilities of the Use of Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2019, no. 1, pp. 205—222. (In Russ.)
Zaytseva L. V., Sukhova N. V. Electronic Evidence in Civil Proceedings: Procedural Proof Issues. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2019, no. 1, pp. 189—204. (In Russ.)
S. M. ZUBAREV
Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow 125993, Russian Federation
S. V. SHULGA, G. G. SHINKARETSKAYA
S. V. SHULGA, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
G. G. SHINKARETSKAYA, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119019, Russian Federation
N. B. KRYSENKOVA, O. I. SAKAEVA
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation