Contents of issue # 6/2019


The Formation and Development of Administrative Justice in the Russian Federation


Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Moscow 121260, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.1

The article was prepared on the basis of the speech of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V.M. Lebedev at the international scientific and practical conference “Administrative Justice: Problems and Prospects of Development”, held in Moscow on September 20—21, 2018 and dedicated to the third anniversary of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation.
The formation of administrative justice in the Russian Federation testifies to the special relevance of the study of its history and current state, the prospects for further development of this legal institution. The article deals with the theoretical and legal basis and features of the institute of administrative justice, the history of administrative justice in Russia, the number, quality and efficiency of consideration of administrative cases by courts. The evolution of doctrinal positions on the role and importance of administrative proceedings is presented. Particular attention is paid to the work of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to ensure the uniformity of judicial practice in the field of administrative proceedings, as well as legislative initiatives of the highest court aimed at the modernization of administrative justice. Issues of formation and development of administrative justice are analysed not only in the national but also in the international context, using the acts of the Council of Europe and the report of the European Commission on the Effectiveness of Justice.
The study applied systemic, comparative legal, historical and statistical methods.
The history of formation and development of administrative justice in the Russian Federation shows that this legal institution meets the needs of the modern state and civil society, provides legal protection of citizens and organizations in disputes with public authorities and officials.

administrative proceedings, Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, efficiency of justice.

For citation
Lebedev V.M. The Formation and Development of Administrative Justice in the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.1


Gusakovskiy P.N. The administrative justice. Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii, 1906, no. 10, pp. 69—123. (In Russ.)

Judicial statutes of November 20, 1864: setting forth the reasoning on which they are based. Part 1. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, 1867. 763 p. (In Russ.)

Nosov Ye. The issues of Soviet administrative justice theory. Sovetskoe pravo, 1925, no. 4, pp. 70—85. (In Russ.)

Stolypin P.A. We need a great Russia...: A complete collection of speeches in the State Duma and the State Council. 1906—1911. Moscow, 1991. 412 p. (In Russ.)

The goals of the development of law. Proletarskaya revolyutsiya i pravo: izdanie Narodnogo komissariata yustitsii, 1921, no. 15, pp. 83—86. (In Russ.)

The history of the Governing Senate for 200 years. Vol. 4. St. Petersburg, 1911. 564 p. (In Russ.)

Judicial Doctrines and Efficiency of Law Enforcement


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.2

The development of law has always been accompanied by the formation of legal doctrines, which are usually understood as a generalized scientific and legal attitude to general and specific issues of law. This article proposes to consider the most effective implementation of legal doctrines in judicial practice, which contributes to empirical enrichment and effectiveness of law. The study of law in three dimensions, legal theory, legal doctrine and law enforcement, confirms that the effective functioning of this three-dimensional system is possible on the basis of interpenetration and interaction of its constituent elements. The convergence of legal systems contributed not only to the adoption of timetested ideas and strengthening the integration principles, but also to the evolution of law enforcement, which clearly demonstrates the development of European constitutional justice. The influence of general doctrines on law enforcement is considered from the standpoint of the formation of judicial doctrines on the basis of judicial discretion, lawmaking, legal interpretation and argumentation, which serve not only to create reasonable legal methods for resolving specific cases, taking into account the principles and concepts of law, but also to deepen the connection between the theory of law and law enforcement. The judicial doctrine thus represents a proven approach to the solution of specific court cases in the context of the achievements of legal science and judicial practice, confirmed by the authority of the judiciary, simultaneously aimed at their development.

judicial doctrines, judicial lawmaking, judicial practice, law enforcement, legal reasoning.

For citation
Hajiyev Kh.I. Judicial Doctrines and Efficiency of Law Enforcement. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 14—27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.2


A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 4. Springer, 2005. Pp. 814—842.

Cappelletti M. The Law-making Power of the Judge and Its Limits: A Comparative Analysis. Monash University Law Review, vol. 8, September 1981, pp. 15—67.

Chashchin A.N. Legal doctrine as a source (form) of Russian law. Moscow, 2019. 239 p. (In Russ.)

Darovskikh S.M. Judicial legal positions in criminal proceedings: theoretical foundations and procedural forms. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2011. 80 p. (In Russ.)

Demidov A.I. Principles of legal doctrine of Russia. Russian Legal Doctrine in the 21st Century: Problems and Solutions. Saratov, 2001. (In Russ.)

Esser J. Grundsetz und Norm in der Richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts. Revue international de droit comparé, vol. 9, no. 1, 1957, pp. 306—308.

Gadzhiev G.A. Decisions of the highest courts of Russia as social capital. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 2015, no. 1, pp. 3—16. (In Russ.)

Gadzhiev Kh.I. Legal doctrines promoting the implementation of the Convention into the national legal order. Implementation of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the Russian legal system. Moscow, 2019. 416 p. (In Russ.)

Khabrieva T.Y. Doctrinal sense of the Russian Constitution. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 2, pp. 34—38. (In Russ.)

Kiska R. Hate speech: a comparison between the European Court of human rights and the United States Supreme Court jurisprudence. Regent University Law Review, 2012, vol. 25, pp. 107—153.

Klatt M. Taking rights less seriously. A Structural analysis of judicial discretion. Ratio Juris 20(4), 2007, pp. 506—529.

Koopmans T. Legislative and judiciary: Present trends. New perspectives for a common law of Europe. Florence; Leiden, 1978. Pp. 309—337.

Kovler A.I. Anthropology of law. Moscow, 2019. 480 p. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsova M.V. Soncept and essence of the sources of law. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2014, no. 12, pp. 15—18. (In Russ.)

MacCormick N. Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy. Oxford, 1984. 282 p.

Malko A.V. Legal doctrine as the most important direction of modern Russian legal policy. Russian Legal Doctrine in the 21st Century: Problems and Solutions. Saratov, 2001. Pp. 8—14. (In Russ.)

Materials of the international scientific-practical conference “Judicial reform in Russia: past, present, future” (November 25 — December 2, 2014). Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)

McNollgast. Polities and the Courts: a positive theory of judicial doctrine and the Rule of law. Southern California Law Review, 1995.

Polyanskiy D.A., Puzikov R.V. Legal doctrine as a special legal phenomenon. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013. Iss. 11, pp. 328—337. (In Russ.)

Rubin E.L., Feely M. Creating Legal Doctrine. Southern California Law Review, 1996, pp. 1989—2037.

Sauveplanne J.G. Codified and Judge Made Law. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982. Pp. 95—120.

Shulga I.V. Concept and types of legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2016. 26 p. (In Russ.)

The Evolution of five legal doctrines in the Supreme Court of Canada. May 5, 2017.

Troper M., Grzegorczyk C. Precedent in France, Interpreting Precedents. Ed. by D.N. MacCormick, R.S. Summers. Routledge, 1997. 38 p.

Tutynina Ye.G. Legal acts as a means of judicial policy. Sud kak subekt pravovoy politiki. Ed. by A.V. Malko. Moscow, 2014. 232 p. (In Russ.)

Vlasenko N.A. Reasonableness and certainty in legal regulation. Moscow, 2017. 157 p. (In Russ.)

Zaytsev O.V. Legal positions in modern legal and judicial practice. Mirovoy sudya. 2018, no. 3, pp. 11—15 (In Russ.)

Zorkin V.D. Constitutional Court of Russia: Doctrine and Practice. Moscow, 2018. 592 p. (In Russ.)

Zorkin V.D. Economics and law: a new context. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2014, May 22. (In Russ.)

Zweigert K., Kotz H. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford; New York, 1998. 708 p.


Local Self-Government and the Constitution of the Russian Federation


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.3

The article is devoted to the analysis of the constitutional model of local self-government. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the content of Article 12 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The author emphasizes that the current law-enforcement practice clearly demonstrates that this provision of the Constitution is not operating properly. It weighs heavily by the absence of any attempt to use it either in the adoption of laws on local self-government or in the implementation of these laws.
In the absence of clearly formulated constitutional principles on the legal nature of local selfgovernment, the author substantiates the idea that local self-government should be considered as an important form of popular sovereignty. It serves as a kind of “extension” of state power on the local level, but with a qualitatively special, namely the decisive participation of the urban and rural population in resolution of issues of local significance. For this purpose, the competence of local self-government is delineated from the competence of state authorities.
In addition to the legal nature and purpose of local self-government in the system of public power, the author considers the territorial basis of the organization of local self-government. Recent legislative initiatives aimed at creating maximum opportunities for uniting of rural settlements are critically evaluated. It is possible to prevent and exclude such a possibility only by establishing clear objective criteria for the creation of rural and other municipalities. The most of these criteria, including approaches to the creation of all municipalities, should be set forth by the Constitution. This will make it possible to give the necessary stability to the territorial structure of the most important institution of democracy and to increase its efficiency in the interests of millions of citizens.

Constitution of the Russian Federation, local self-government, public power, territorial organization of local self-government, rural settlements.

For citation
Vasiliev V.I. Local Self-Government and the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 28—35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.3


Bondar N.S. Bukva i dukh rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: 20-letniy opyt garmonizatsii v svete konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2013, no. 11.

Kovler A.I. Konstitutsiya Rossii kak sravnitelnyy proekt (k istorii sozdaniya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii). Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2019, no. 1.

Vasilev V.I. K voprosu o territorialnykh urovnyakh mestnogo samoupravleniya. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 1.

Vasilev V.I. Yeshche raz o territorialnykh urovnyakh mestnogo samoupravleniya. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1.

Zorkin V.D. Dukh i bukva Konstitutsii. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2018, October 10.

Mechanisms of Realization of the Constitutional Right of Citizens to Participate in the Management of Public Affairs


Tula State University, Tula 300012, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.4

Nowadays it is widely believed that there are many shortcomings in the current approaches of democratic governance. In order to find a new form of democracy taking into account the needs of society, the new forms of governance are being actively developed and tested. Participatory democracy is one of these forms of governance.
Participatory democracy and its components have already been reflected in the constitutional law of foreign countries. The effectiveness and impact of its management methods have highlighted the necessity of their wider introduction in the Russian Federation. It should be noted that the components of participatory democracy, due to their low formalization in comparison with classical democracy, successfully use information technologies, and this in turn increases their attractiveness in the information society.
Participatory democracy is a relatively new phenomenon for our country, but some regions have already implemented projects based on its management methods. In the author’s opinion, participatory budgeting is one of the most successful method of participatory democracy. The author considers the experience of implementation of the participatory budgeting program based on the example of the Tula region concept, which significantly differs from similar programs in other regions of the Russian Federation and abroad. The author analyzes the legal mechanism of interaction between the authorities and the population involved in the project, and identifies the gaps in the legislation, which have affected the implementation of the participatory budgeting program.

democracy, participatory democracy, participation of citizens in the management of public affairs, participatory budgeting, regional legislation in the Russian Federation.

For citation
Evsikov K.S. Mechanisms of Realization of the Constitutional Right of Citizens to Participate in the Management of Public Affairs. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 36—49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.4


Aragones E. A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre. European Economic Review, 2009, vol. 53, iss. 1.

Bauer V.P. Prospects of Municipal Tax Recovery by Means of Initiative Budgeting. Nalogi, 2018, no. 3, pp. 3—7. (In Russ.)

Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Contract Law. Book One: General Provisions. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2011. 837 p. (In Russ.)

Bratus S.N. Legal Liability and Legality. Essay Theory. Moscow, 1976. 215 p. (In Russ.)

Ebzeev B.S. The Constitution, Power and Freedom in Russia: The Experience of Synthetic Research. Moscow, 2014. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report 2019. Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Ex-mayor of the city in the Tula region received a term for embezzlement. Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019). (In Russ.)

Gellap Dzh., Rey S.F. The Pulse of Democracy: The Public-Opinion Poll and How It Works. Ed. by N.P. Popov, A.V. Kuleshova. Moscow, 2017. 256 p. (In Russ.)

Gilman H.S. Democracy Reinvented: Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America. Washington, 2016.

Gilman H.S. The Moment for Participatory Democracy. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2017, April 19.

Kabyshev V.T. The Constitutional Sourt Protected Democracy (Reflections to the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 22, 2013 No. 8-P). Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2014, no. 2, pp. 11—20. (In Russ.)

Kosheleva E.V., Lebedeva Ya.I. “Little Venice” Does not Meet the Standards of a “Big” One (Analysis of the Preliminary Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law No. CDL-PI(2017)004 Concerning Venezuela Legislation). Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2017, no. 6, pp. 120—126. (In Russ.)

Kozlova E.I., Kutafin O.E. Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 1995. 480 p. (In Russ.)

Laval O. Administrative Transparency and the Development of Participatory Democracy. Lex Russica, 2016, no. 1, pp. 68—74. (In Russ.)

Lebreton G. La participative: un bilan. La participative: enjeux et. L'Harmattan, 2013.

NOT the People's Budget? (In Russ.). Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Order or Democracy? (The Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) Opinion Poll). (In Russ.). Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Rumyantsev A.G. Effective Opposition Principle Appeared Low Effective a Commentary on German Federal Constitutional Court Decision of May 3, 2016 (2 BvE 4/14). Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, 2016, no. 3, pp. 114—120. (In Russ.)

Scientific Concept of Development of the Russian Legislation. Ed. by T.Y. Khabrieva, Yu.A. Tikhomirov. 7th ed. Moscow, 2015. 544 p. (In Russ.)

Text of the Constitution of Colombia (1991). Available at:

The regional government discussed the implementation of the project “People's budget”. (In Russ.). Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Tikhomirov Yu.A. Public Law. Moscow, 1995. 496 p. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirov Yu.A. Scientific School of Public Law. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 9, pp. 16—24. (In Russ.)

Unified Procurement Information System. (In Russ.). Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Wike R., Simmons K., Stokes B., Fetterolf J. Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy. Available at: (accessed 06.02.2019).

Yakovlev V.F. Russia: Economics, Civil Law (Theory and Practice). Moscow, 2000. 224 p. (In Russ.)


On the Subsidiary Liability of Beneficiaries of Offshore Companies and Trusts


Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow 123995, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.5

The author examines the issues of the subsidiary liability of beneficial owners of offshore companies and trusts in the light of the requirements of the Russian laws on the subsidiary liability of the persons controlling the debtor’s entities.
The goal of the article is the analysis of the Federal Law «On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)», as well as the Russian case law regarding the bringing of offshore companies to subsidiary liability for the debts of Russian companies. The particular purpose of this article is to ascertain whether the current Russian laws and practice of their interpretation and application make it possible to bring controlling persons to a subsidiary liability without piercing the corporate veil, including those persons who act through offshore holding companies and trusts.
The author used the methods of analysis and synthesis.
The author concludes that the Russian rules on the subsidiary liability of the controlling persons apply to situations where the Russian organization — the debtor was brought to a bankruptcy by the actions of its offshore parent company. The persons, who actually managed with such offshore company, in particular, who gave the instructions to nominal shareholders and directors of an offshore company, as a result of which (instructions) the Russian organization was brought to bankruptcy, may be brought to subsidiary liability under the Russian law. In the light of the rules of Article 1202(4) of the Russian Civil Code for bringing to a subsidiary liability a person controlling a Russian debtor through an offshore holding structure, there is no need to refer to a foreign law if the applicant is satisfied with the rules of the Russian laws regarding liability of the persons controlling debtor’s entities.

subsidiary liability, controlling persons, personal law, offshore company, trust, beneficiary owner, debtor, bankruptcy, burden of proof, controlled foreign companies, offshore jurisdictions, automatic exchange of information, piercing the corporate veil.

For citation
Kanashevsky V.A. On the Subsidiary Liability of Beneficiaries of Offshore Companies and Trusts. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 50—57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.5


Altukhov A.V., Levichev S.V. Procedural characteristics of consideration of applications for bringing the persons who control the debtors to subsidiary liability in bankruptcy. Sudya, 2018, no. 4, pp. 27—32. (In Russ.)

Kanashevskiy V.A. On disclosure of Information about Beneficiaries of Trusts and Offshore Companies: the Current Status and Perspectives. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 2, pp. 81—86. (In Russ.)

Kanashevskiy V.A. The Concept of Beneficial Ownership in Russian Judicial Practice (Private Law Aspects). Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 9, pp. 27—38. (In Russ.)

Khavanova I.A. Interdependent Persons: Corporate Covers and Fiscal Issues. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 7, pp. 112—122. (In Russ.)

Sinitsyn S.A. The Legal Means of Preventing and Combating the Dissipating of Assets by the Russian Banks: Law Improvement Issues. Predprinimatelskoe pravo, 2018, no. 1, pp. 66—70. (In Russ.)

Using a Nominee Company. The Easy Guide to Nominee Companies. Available at:

Ensuring the Economic Space Unity as a Goal of Corporate Procurement Legislation: Problems of Maintenance and Implementation


Volgograd Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Volgograd 400131, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.6

Regulation of corporate procurements (i.e. non-public procurements) is currently based on legislation norms that defines general principles of regulation of legal entities’ certain procurement activity types. The regulation nature in this realm assumes the importance to research the content and legal significance of the norms-principles and norms-objectives provided by this legislation. Such a goal that ensures the economic space unity does not have a common understanding either in academic research or in law enforcement practice. At present, there are no studies of the causes and practical consequences of declaring this goal when regulating procurement activities of corporate customers.
The purpose of this article is to resolve the issue of the content and mechanism of practical implementation of the goal to ensure the economic space unity when individual legal entities undertake procurement activities.
This goal is achieved on the basis of an of current law’s enforcement practices analysis using general research methods, as well as formal legal, systemic and structural approaches.
The author reveals the content of the goal for ensuring the economic space unity, as well as the reasons for its consolidation in the norms of the legislation on corporate procurements. Specific legal rules that ensure the realization of this goal are shown, the relationship of creating guarantees of a single economic space with other objectives of procurement legislation is established, specific aspects of the interaction of these goals are identified. The article systemizes the grounds for recognizing the actions of customers conflicting with the purpose.

procurement of goods, works and services by the certain types of legal entities, normgoals, economic space unity, commodity market, geographic boundaries of the market, restriction of competition.

For citation
Donetskov Ye.S. Ensuring the Economic Space Unity as a Goal of Corporate Procurement Legislation: Problems of Maintenance and Implementation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 58—66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.6


Amangeldy A.A., Belyaeva O.A., Varlamova A.N. et al. Competition in the market economy: limits of freedom and restrictions. Ed. by A. V. Gabov. Moscow, 2016. 374 p. (In Russ.)

Aristotle. The Works. Vol. 1. Ed. by V.F. Asmus. Moscow, 1976. 550 p. (In Russ.)

Avakyan S.A. Constitutional law of Russia. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2010. 719 p. (In Russ.)

Baglay M.V. Constitutional law of Russian Federation. Moscow, 2007. 784 p. (In Russ.)

Belyaeva O.A. Corporate purchases: problems of legal regulation. Moscow, 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.)

Gambarov Yu.S. Civil Law. Generality. Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. Moscow, 2003. 816 p. (In Russ.)

Kichik K.V. Russian legislation on public procurement (review article). Public procurement: problems of law enforcement. Materials of the Third All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (June 9, 2015, Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov). Moscow, 2015. Pp. 91—114 (In Russ.)

Kuzovkin D.V. Ensuring the unity of the economic space of the Russian Federation (constitutional legal research). Cand. diss. thesis. Omsk, 2005. 26 p. (In Russ.)

Mnishko V.V. Constitutional and legal foundations of the unity of the economic space in the Russian Federation. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2003. 26 p. (In Russ.)

Features That Ensure Performance of Obligations Within the State Defense Order’s Procurement Contract


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.7

Ensuring performance of obligations under the government contract is one of the main civil mechanisms allowing the state customer to react preventively to actions of unfair suppliers (contractors, performers). Ensuring creates additional expenses for participant's procurement procedures regarding the bank guarantee or customer's account balance payment. Therefore the Law on the State Defense Order provides the special rules of ensuring performance of obligations under the contract directed to decrease additional expenses for enterprises of defense industry complex.
The article highlights practical issues related to: the definition of the object of purchase, in relation to which specific rules are established to ensure the fulfillment of contractual obligations; the nature and essence of the requirements for participants in the placement of the state defense order, which give preferences in the field of obligations enforcement; defining the stage of the submitted procurement procedure documents confirming compliance with these requirements; and the content and procedure for granting these documents to procurement participants.
The author suggests change of legislative approach to regulation of ensuring obligations performance depending on purchased goods' (works, services) specifics and their purpose. The article suggests the author's edition of provisions of the Law on the State Defense Order, which allows to eradicate ambiguous practice of use of the relevant standards by the state customers, procurement participants, arbitration tribunals and Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation. This, in turn and finally, might allow increase of efficiency of procurement in the field of ensuring defense and safety of the state.

contract system, state defense order, customer, public contract, ensuring performance of obligations under the contract.

For citation
Mikhashin A.V. Features That Ensure Performance of Obligations Within the State Defense Order’s Procurement Contract. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 67—77. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.7


Belyaeva O.A. Alternatives for earnest money at bidding. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2011, no. 11, pp. 39—44. (In Russ.)

Belyaeva O.A. Guarantee deduction at the contractor relations in construction. Pravo i ekonomika, 2008, no. 5, pp. 26—30. (In Russ.)

Belyaeva O.A. State defense order: legislative nonsense. Auktsionnyy vestnik, 2016, no. 302, p. 2. (In Russ.)

Bulaev S.V. State institutions: accounting and taxation. Kazennye uchrezhdeniya: bukhgalterskiy uchet i nalogooblozhenie, 2013, no. 3, pp. 57—65. (In Russ.)

Morozova A.A. Legal problems of ensuring performance of obligations under the government (municipal) contract. Public purchases: law enforcement problems. Materials of the Third All-Russian scientific and practical conference (on June 9, 2015, Lomonosov Moscow State University). Moscow, 2015. 250 p. (In Russ.)

Povarov Yu.S. To a question of unambiguity of the terminology used by the legislator. Problems of implementation of the civil rights: interuniversity collection of scientific works. Samara, 2002. 235 p. (In Russ.)

Svininykh Ye.A. Experience and ways to defense and security procurement system optimization: the legal aspect. Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh, 2015, no. 2, pp. 56—68. (In Russ.)

System of ensuring legislative activity of the Russian Federation. Available at:


Administrative Prejudice in Criminal Law: Problems of Theory and Practice


University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117638, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.8

The article notes that the design of corpus delicti using administrative prejudice provides a number of indisputable advantages: it increases the preventive potential of the corresponding criminal law prohibition; increases the flexibility and adaptability of the legal protection of the interests of individuals, society and the state, provides the legislator with greater opportunities in terms of inter-sectoral differentiation of criminal and administrative responsibility; allows the legislator to carry out the “soft” criminalization of acts, while respecting the principle of economy of criminal repression, as well as for the decriminalization of acts that do not pose a significant public danger.
Based on the analysis of judicial practice, it is proved that crimes with administrative prejudice cannot be considered as a mechanical combination of two administrative offenses. When using the analysed legal construction, the first administrative offense characterizes not the objective side of the crime, but the specific status of the subject of the crime - its administrative punishment.
Analysing the legislative miscalculations made in the construction of corpus delicti with administrative prejudice, the author emphasizes that they do not detract from the undoubted merits of this legal construction. Administrative prejudice - skilfully used - is a very effective tool that ensures the coordinated effect of related prescriptions of tort administrative and criminal law, allowing for the implementation of “targeted”, addressed prevention of unlawful behaviour. That is why it should take a worthy place in the arsenal of technical and legal means of implementing criminal policy.

administrative prejudice, crimes with administrative prejudice.

For citation
Kapinus O.S. Administrative Prejudice in Criminal Law: Problems of Theory and Practice. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 78—86. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.8


Bezverkhov A.G. Vozvrashchenie “administrativnoy preyuditsii” v ugolovnoe zakonodatelstvo Rossii. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2012, no. 1.

Chikin D.S. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya (ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika, problemy kvalifikatsii i zakonodatelnogo konstruirovaniya). Cand. diss. Krasnodar, 2013.

Kovalev M.I. Prestuplenie i prostupok. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatelstva po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usilenie borby s pravonarusheniyami. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Sverdlovsk, 1982.

Ovechkina Ye.V. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii v ugolovnom prave Rossii. Zakon i pravo, 2009, no. 5.

Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. Ed. by K.V. Obrazhiev, N.I. Pikurov. Moscow, 2018.

Tarbagaev A.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost v ugolovnom prave. Pravovedenie, 1992, no. 2.

Yamasheva G.V. K voprosu o vosstanovlenii instituta administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakone. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 10.

Issues of Criminal Policy Problems for Countering Safety Violation


V.A. KAZAKOVA, Institute of International law and Justice, Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow 119034, Russian Federation

S.Yu. KORABLEVA, Institute of International law and Justice, Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow 119034, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.9

Criminal cases on safety violation are often widely publicized and generate public debate. This is due to many factors, in particular the fact that such crimes are usually associated with causing harm to life or health, and their public investigation often reveals serious security gaps. In such a situation, the law enforcement authorities are tempted to apply the measures of criminal repression as rigidly as possible. However, the problem is that the effectiveness of achieving the objectives of criminal policy in the penalty for a safety violation can be very low for many reasons. All of them are discussed in detail in this article.
The purpose of the study is to analyze the problems associated with the punishment for a safety rules violation.
The methodological basis of the study is the system method. Also, such methods as analysis, synthesis and legal modeling are used. The data of statistics, as well as judicial practice literature are analyzed.
As a result of the research problems of criminalization and punishability of safety rules violation are formulated, which require a systemic solution. The authors demonstrates that here a private warning requires a minimum penalty, and also that judicial practice basically goes exactly along this path. It is proved that the effectiveness of achieving the objectives of the general prevention in the conviction of a safety violation can be extremely low, and often on the contrary, contribute to a harmful result from the social development point of view.

criminal policy, criminalization and punishability, private crime prevention, general crime prevention, negligence, reckless complicity, safety violation, medical errors, competition of norms.

For citation
Kazakova V.A., Korableva S.Yu. Issues of Criminal Policy Problems for Countering Safety Violation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 87—96. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.9


Criminal law. General part. Crime. Academic course. Ed. by N.A. Lopashenko. Moscow, 2016. Vol. 10: Circumstances Excluding the Criminality of a Deed. 507 p. (In Russ.)

Inshakov S.M., Kazakova V. A. Methodological Approach Towards Punishabiltiy of Crimes in the Context of Modern Criminal Policy. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2016, no. 1, pp. 84—92. (In Russ.)

Kovalev A.V., Martemyanova A. A. Particularities of Establishment of Cause-Effect Relations when Carrying Out a Forensic Medical Examination in Cases of “Not Rendering” Aid to the Patient. Scientific school of criminal procedure and criminalistics of St. Petersburg State University and modern legal science. Krasnoyarsk, 2016. Pp. 325—333. (In Russ.)

Kursaev A.V. Careless Co-Infliction as Problem in Criminal-Legal Studies. Vestnik TGU, 2011, no. 10, pp. 326—331. (In Russ.)

Luneev V.V. Subjective imputation. Moscow, 2000. 71 p. (In Russ.)

Mikhaylova I.A. Blanket rules of criminal law and their application by law enforcement agencies. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2009. 19 p. (In Russ.)

Mukhortova M.V. The Concepts of Crimes Connected with Violation of Special Rules. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2012, no. 3, pp. 169—178. (In Russ.)

Nersesyan V.A. Responsibility for Crimes Committed Through Negligence. St. Petersburg, 2002. 221 p. (In Russ.)

Pikurov N.I. Determination of The Nature of Crimes with Blanket Characteristics of Corpus Delicti. Moscow, 2009. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Rarog A.I., Nersesyan V.A. Negligent complicity in infliction and its criminal significance. Zakonodatelstvo, 1999, no. 12, pp. 71—77. (In Russ.)

Tannenbaum F. Crime and the community. New York, 1938. 487 p.

Yevdokimov A.A. Violation of special safety rules in criminal law. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2013. 30 p. (In Russ.)

Академический курс: в 10 т. / под ред. Н.А. Лопашенко. М., 2016. Т. 10: Обстоятельства, исключающие преступность деяния.

Criminal Liability in Medical Care: Legal Practice and Legislation Trends


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.10

The purpose of the present work is the legal analysis of the operating criminal regulation in the field of medical care. So, according to the approved “May Decrees” of the Russian President, strategic tasks of a solution of the existing problems in the social sphere are defined. Among the main development directions the task of forming a system of patients' rights protection is defined. In particular, it concerns enhancing the medical care control. However further development of Russia as a social state needs not only enhancing control in the considered sphere, but also formation of uniform approach to criminal regulation of medical care.
The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation contains a number of articles under which in case of infliction of harm to health, when rendering medical services, health care workers can be brought to trial. Meanwhile the organization of medical care is regulated by a number of regulations of federal importance and subordinate regulations, for which violations responsibility is set. Besides, emergence of new medical technologies demands criminal protection of the patients' rights against illegal actions. However development of the criminal legislation in this sphere strongly lags behind progress in medicine. In this regard in criminal law there are gaps demanding elimination.
The main objective of the author consists in application study of the problems related to criminal regulation of medical care. In this connection some examples of judicial practice are analyzed. The conclusion shows heterogeneity in law-enforcement practice. For better understanding the further improvement of the criminal legislation for violations in the medical sphere, the author carries out the retrospective analysis of development of doctors' criminal liability for the violations since the beginning of formation of a civilization to the present.
The article uses general-logical methods of knowledge, which include analysis, synthesis and deduction. Also historical and logical methods, methods of theoretical and empirical knowledge are used.
In this research the author comes to the conclusion that the existing criminal legislation provides protection of patients' rights, however there is a need for reform, as it does not meet modern progress in the field of medicine.

medical activity, failure to provide the aid, health workers, causing heavy harm to health by negligence, harm.

For citation
Khromova N.M. Criminal Liability in Medical Care: Legal Practice and Legislation Trends. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 97—110. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.10


Anthology of general history of state and law. Ed. by Z.M. Chernilovskiy, V.N. Sadikov. Moscow, 1996. 413 p. (In Russ.)

Code of laws of the Russian Empire. Vol. XIII. St. Petersburg, 1900. 353 p. (In Russ.)

Comment on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (scientific and practical). Ed. by A.I. Chuchaev. Moscow, 2019. 1536 p. (In Russ.)

Comment on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Special part. Sections VII—VIII. Vol. 2. Ed. by V.M. Lebedev. 2017 (access from SPS “Consultant Plus”) (In Russ.)

Glashev A.A. Medical right: practical guidance for lawyers and physicians. Moscow, 2004. 202 p. (In Russ.)

Gromov A.P. Rights, duties and responsibility of health workers. Moscow, 1976. 227 p. (In Russ.)

Information Technologies in the Sphere of Health Protection: Commentaries on Russian Federal Law No. 242-FZ, July 29, 2017 “About Introduction of Amendments to Separate Acts of the Russian Federation Concerning Use of Information Technologies in the Sphere of Health Protection”. Ed. by N.V. Putilo. M., 2019. 96 p. (In Russ.)

Judicial responsibility of doctors. Leningrad; Moscow, 1926. 94 p. (In Russ.)

Khromova N.M. Criminalization of violations when using of small size vessels on water objects. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika, no. 11. 2016, pp. 28—40. (In Russ.)

Kolokolov G.R. Protection of the rights of patients. Moscow, 2009. 192 p. (In Russ.)

Koshaeva T.O. Judicial practice and questions of qualification of crimes against health. Kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki. Iss. 9. Ed. by K.B. Yaroshenko. Moscow, 2004. Pp. 205—221. (In Russ.)

Law in the Era of Biotechnology: Collected materials of the Student Conference (Moscow, September 27, 2018). Ed. by Yu.N. Kashevarova, S.B. Balkhaeva, F.V. Tsomartova. Moscow, 2018. 232 p. (In Russ.)

Legal regulation of transplantation in the Russian Federation: scientific and practical manual. Ed. by N.V. Putilo. Moscow, 2019. 176 p. (In Russ.)

Manu's laws. Moscow, 1960. 360 p. (In Russ.)

Marchenko Yu.F. Medicine in Ancient Egypt. Tvoe zdorove, 1994, no. 3, pp. 43—48. (In Russ.)

Putilo N.V. Comment on Principles of the legislation of the Russian Federation on protection of public health (itemized). Moscow, 2003. 240 p. (In Russ.)

Putilo N.V., Volkova N. S. Telemedicine: Societal Needs and Possibilities of Legislation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 6, pp. 124—135 (In Russ.)

Sisakyan A.K. To history of legal responsibility of doctors. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, 2015, no. 2, pp. 108—111. (In Russ.)

Sorokina T. S. Medicine history. 8th ed. Moscow, 2008. 560 p. (In Russ.)

The Humanization of the Modern Criminal Law. Ed. by V.P. Kashepov. Moscow, 2015. 336 p. (In Russ.)

The Right of Citizens for Medicinal Provision. Ed. by N.V. Putilo. Moscow, 2017. 216 p. (In Russ.)

Zagoskin N. P. Doctors and medical matter in Ancient Russia. Kazan, 1891. 76 p. (In Russ.)


Some Legal Problems of Unemployment Protection of Senior Citizens


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.11

One of the main objectives of the Action Strategy in the interests of senior citizens in the Russian Federation until 2025 is the creation of economic, social and legal conditions that ensure the non discrimination of senior citizens and encourage incentives for older people to continue working. The pension reform carried out in the Russian Federation since 2019, which envisages a gradual increase in the retirement age, causes increasing of labor activity. In this regard, the problem of preserving the employment of older people and protecting them from unemployment is of particular relevance.
The goal of the research is to improve the employment promotion and protection against unemployment mechanism, to identify the problems which senior citizens face when looking for employment, and the rationale for proposals for their elimination. The main areas of research are related to the search for approaches to assist senior citizens in preserving employment, obtaining new employment, and material support in case of unemployment.
The article covers the problems of loss of work by citizens of the older generation and the inability to find it in the short term due to the liquidation or reduction of old and the emergence of new high-tech jobs that require additional professional competencies and skills, the need to change professional activities due to reduced ability to work, termination of work for reasons of psychological pressure, personal, family circumstances.
The author formulates specific proposals to improve the mechanism for promoting employment and social protection of older citizens, including those aimed at preserving their employment, reducing the period of search for a suitable job by clarifying the criteria for such work, granting priority right to undergo vocational training for subsequent employment, as well as increasing material support during the period of unemployment, which should be reflected in the legislation on labor and employment in the Russian Federation.

senior citizens, persons of pre-retirement age, workers of retirement age, employment, arrangement of labour, unemployment.

For citation
Seregina L.V. Some Legal Problems of Unemployment Protection of Senior Citizens. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 111—125. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.11


Abdullaeva E.T. kyzy. Stimulation and Motivation of Labor of the Elderly Population. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2018, no. 2, pp. 41—43. (In Russ.)

Belov V.P. Aspects of labour activity of old-age pensioners. Working age of old-age pensioners: issues of stimulation and organization of their work. Moscow, 1975. Pp. 5—14. (In Russ.)

Causes of job loss: voluntary care and reduction. (In Russ.). Available at:

Chesalina O.V. From Non-Standard Occupational Forms to Work Based on Internet Platforms. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2018, no. 1, pp. 22—25. (In Russ.)

Dmitrieva I.K. Guarantees of labour rights of citizens in the sphere of labour and social security. Practice of application of labour legislation and legislation on social security. Ed. by K. N. Gusov. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 21—28. (In Russ.)

Gimpelson V., Kapelyushnikov R. Precarious work. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2006, no. 1, pp. 122—143. (In Russ.)

International classification of functioning, disability and health. (In Russ.). Available at:

Kokosh A.A. The state of working capacity and ways to increase the labour activity of persons of pre-retirement age and old-age pensioners at machine-building enterprises. Minsk, 1979. 172 p. (In Russ.)

Krylov K.D. From the First Labour Code of the RSFSR to the First Pension Code in Russia: Development of Constitutional Guidelines. Report on the Labour Law and Social Security Law Section “100th anniversary of the first codification of labour law: traditions and development” of the XIX Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Law Faculty of the Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU) and the XV International scientific and practical conference “Kutafinskie readings” of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) “The Constitution of the Russian Federation and the modern rule of law”, held on 27-29 November 2018 in the Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)

Kukhtevich I.I. The state of working ability of old-age pensioners and persons of preretirement age in the metallurgical industry. Dnepropetrovsk, 1975. 164 p. (In Russ.)

Kurennoy A.M. Legal regulation of the conclusion of an employment contract and transfer to another job. Zakonodatelstvo, 2002, no. 11, pp. 60—72. (In Russ.)

Labour and employment in Russia. Statistical collection. Moscow, 2017. (In Russ.). Available at: 6801766.

Lushnikov A.M., Lushnikova M. V. Labour rights in the 21st century: current state and development trends. Moscow, 2015. 268 p. (In Russ.)

Lyutov N.L., Gerasimova E.S. International labour standards and Russian labour legislation. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2015. 190 p. (In Russ.)

Motsnaya O.V. Atypical employment: some problems of theory and practice. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2009. 26 p. (In Russ.)

Over 50 years not to offer. (In Russ.). Available at:

Russian labour market: trends, institutions, structural changes. Report of the Centre for Labour Market Studies (CLMS) and the Laboratory for Labour Market Studies (LLMS) of the National Research Institute Higher School of Economics. Ed. by V. Gimpelson, R. Kapelyushnikov, S. Roshchin. Moscow, 2017. 145 p. (In Russ.)

Socio-economic situation in Russia. Federal State Statistics Service. Moscow, 2018. 402 p. (In Russ.)

Sonin M.Ya., Dyskin A. A. Senior citizen in the family and society. Moscow, 1984. 175 p. (In Russ.)

Speech of the Director of the Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health R. U. Khabriev at the scientific-practical seminar “Geriatric assistance: problems and prospects for legal regulation” 26.09.2018. (In Russ.). Available at:

WHO report on the International Day of Senior Citizens (1 October). Section “Aging and life cycle”. 30 September 2015. Available at:

Yershova Ye.A. Conclusion of a fixed-term employment contract. Trudovoe pravo, 2007, no. 2, pp. 64—81. (In Russ.)

Zakharov M.L. Payments for old-age pensions to working pensioners. International and Russian pension standards: a comparative analysis. Ed. by E.G. Tuchkova, Yu.V. Vasileva. Moscow, 2013. 440 p. (In Russ.)

Medical Activity as an Object of Legal Regulation


St. Petersburg Institute of Dentistry of Рostgraduate Еducation, St. Petersburg 191025, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.12

Today in the Russian legal science there is no single approach to understanding the essence of medical activity and determining the method of its legal regulation, which determines the relevance of research on this problem.
The purpose of the research is to study medical activity as a legal category and an object of legal regulation. The research tasks are: to analyze the content of the legal definition of “medical activity” and related concepts; consider existing approaches to understanding the essence of the legal regulation of medical practice; identify the sources of legal regulation of medical activity; identify existing problems in the area under study.
During the research, along with general scientific logical methods of cognition, formal legal and comparative legal methods were used.
The article analyzes the concept of "medical activity” in connection with the concepts of “health protection”, “health care”, “medical care”. It is noted that medical activity includes various types of professional activity, the object of which is human health, but the main subject of medical activity is associated with the performance of various works (services) in providing medical care. The review of different points of view concerning the understanding of the legal nature of medical activity is presented. The characteristic of the main sources of legal regulation of medical activity is given. Attention is drawn to the fact that the Federal Law of November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ “On the basis of health protection in the Russian Federation” stated the expressed dominance of administrative regulators of medical activity, established a regime of centralized administration and strict regulation. At the same time, by-laws have a great regulatory impact, including the orders of the Russian Ministry of Health. However, the important role played by the customs of medical practice, as well as the ethical principles of the medical profession. The author upholds the idea of recognition of medicine as a special kind of socially significant professional activity, providing the constitutional right of citizens to health protection and medical care and therefore requiring special legal regulation.

legal regulation, medical activity, medical care, health protection, ethical norms in law.

For citation
Danilov E.O. Medical Activity as an Object of Legal Regulation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 126—136. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.12


Belkin A.A. Analogy in Public Law. Pravovedenie, 1992, no. 6, pp. 13—24. (In Russ.)

Big Encyclopedic Dictionary. (In Russ.). Available at: (accessed 05.10.2018).

Bratanovskiy S.N. Administrative Law. Special part. Moscow, 2013. 503 p. (In Russ.)

Gal I.G. Obligation to provide medical service. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2014. 24 p. (In Russ.)

Khabrieva T.Y. Main Vectors and Problems of Development of Social Legislation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.)

Khzanyan N.Sh. Local Legal Acts of Medical Institutions. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 11, pp. 41—50. (In Russ.).

Laptev V.A. Medical activity: legal nature and sources of legal regulation. Meditsinskoe pravo, 2013, no. 3, pp. 15—18. (In Russ.)

Lazarev V.V. Gaps in the Law and Ways to Eliminate Them. Moscow, 1974. 184 p. (In Russ.)

Melikhov A.V., Mokhov A.A. Activities for the provision of medical services — a kind of entrepreneurial activity. Meditsinskoe pravo, 2006, no. 2, pp. 27—33. (In Russ.)

Mnatsakanyan A.S. Legal Evaluation of Medical Activity in the Structure of Civil Liability. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2008, no. 1, pp. 111—113. (In Russ.)

Mokhov A.A. Medical Activities as a Kind of Social Entrepreneurship. Meditsinskoe pravo, 2016, no. 1, pp. 6—10. (In Russ.)

Pomazkova S.I. On the Significance of the Relationship between the Concepts of “Medical Care” and “Medical Services” for the Realization of the Rights of Citizens to Health Protection. Yuridicheskiy mir, 2012, no. 11, pp. 35—38. (In Russ.)

Putilo N.V. Legislation of the Russian Federation on Health Protection of Citizens: on the Treshold of Change. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2010, no. 10, pp. 36—45. (In Russ.)

Samigullin V.K. Local Normative Legal Regulation: Status and Perspectives. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 4, pp. 15—24. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirov A.V. Legislative Reform of Health Care: Discussion and Conclusions. Glavnyy vrach: khozyaystvo i pravo, 2012, no. 2, pp. 40—48. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirov A.V. Mandatory Organization of Medical Activities. Glavnyy vrach: khozyaystvo i pravo, 2012, no. 4, pp. 28—52. (In Russ.)


On the Sporadic Application of Certain Provisions of the Special Part of the Administrative Code on Administrative Liability of Legal Entities


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.13

The institution of administrative responsibility is an effective legal means of influencing public relations. Dynamic changes of this institution are aimed at strengthening the administrative responsibility of legal entities. In some cases it is due to the nature and degree of public danger of administrative offenses, and is achieved through a significant increase in the composition of administrative offenses and their complexity.
The purpose of the article is to identify the status, trends in the development of the Institute of administrative responsibility of legal entities and prospects for its improvement. Attention is focused on such aspect as efficiency of application of norms on administrative responsibility.
The objectives of the study are: consideration of the features of the rules on administrative responsibility of legal entities; analysis of judicial practice of consideration of cases of administrative offenses committed by legal entities; analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of the rules on administrative responsibility of legal entities.
The research methodology includes: a systematic approach as the main method of studying law, analysis and synthesis, statistical, formal legal, logical methods.
Along with the improvement of the rules on administrative responsibility, there is a constant increase in the number of legal entities brought to responsibility. The analysis of judicial practice of consideration of cases on administrative offenses committed by legal entities shows that along with the presence of a number of widely used compositions of administrative offenses, the application of certain rules of the Administrative Code on the responsibility of legal entities due to various factors is sporadic. At the same time, the infrequent application of certain rules on administrative responsibility cannot reliably confirm the absence of their constituent elements of offenses in the activities of legal entities, but rather due to problems in identifying illegal actions (inaction) that form the composition of an administrative offense, and in the course of proceedings on such offenses.
When considering these compositions of administrative offenses, the factors affecting the effectiveness of law enforcement are analyzed, and the need to take them into account when improving the institution of administrative responsibility of legal entities in the modern conditions of development of society and the state is indicated. It is concluded that the institute of administrative responsibility of legal entities needs to be reformed, including by eliminating the rules that do not correspond to the existing social relations, taking into account the analysis of law enforcement.

administrative responsibility, legal entity, administrative offense, law enforcement, administrative investigation, judicial practice, effectiveness of legal norms.

For citation
Seleznev V.A. On the Sporadic Application of Certain Provisions of the Special Part of the Administrative Code on Administrative Liability of Legal Entities. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 137—150. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.13


Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinskiy V.I., Samoshchenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. The effectiveness of legal norms. Moscow, 1980. 280 p. (In Russ.)

Lopatin V.N. Problems and perspectives of codification of the legislation in the sphere of informational law and intellectual property. Informatsionnoe pravo, 2014, no. 3, pp. 4—10. (In Russ.)

Lopatin V.N. Seven lessons of codification of intellectual property legislation. Yuridicheskiy mir, 2014, no. 1, pp. 30—38. (In Russ.)

On the status of legal protection, use and protection of intellectual property rights in the Russian Federation in 2012. The analytical report. Ed. by V.N. Lopatin. Moscow, 2013. 659 p. (In Russ.)

Panov A.B. Concept of administrative responsibility. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2011, no. 12, pp. 42—46. (In Russ.)

Parshina O.V. Administrative responsibility of juridical persons: how the legal institute changes its legal nature. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2014, no. 11, pp. 57—59. (In Russ.)

Popugaev Yu.I. On internal sectoral conflict of laws providing for administrative and criminal responsibility, means of resolution thereof. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2013, no. 10, pp. 10—15. (In Russ.)

Rener N.A. Criminalistic characteristics of illegal amber traffic. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2016, no. 12, pp. 5—7. (In Russ.)

Rossinskiy B.V. Some administrative liability issues and development perspectives. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2017, no. 6, pp. 38—42. (In Russ.)

Seleznev V.A. Contentious issues of legislation on administrative liability of legal persons. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 11, pp. 121—130. (In Russ.)

Serkov P.P. Administrative responsibility in Russian law: current thinking and new approaches. Moscow, 2012. 480 p. (In Russ.)

Shupletsova Yu.I. Actual issues of liability for violent legislation. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2018, no. 1, pp. 80—91. (In Russ.)

Sorokin V.D. Comment of selected places of the Code of administrative offences of the Russian Federation. Yuridicheskaya mysl, 2002, no. 4, pp. 3—10. (In Russ.)

Summary statistical information on the activities of the federal courts of general jurisdiction and justices of the peace for 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 years. (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 05.07.2018).

Tikhomirov Yu.A. Theory of law. Moscow, 1982. 257 p. (In Russ.)

Zyryanov S.M. Public Danger of Administrative Offence Revisited. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2017, no. 6, pp. 43—46. (In Russ.).


The Problem of Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Education Measures


Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.14

Many states use a wide range of tools directly or indirectly contributing to the minimization of corruption. Article 13 of the Convention of United Nations against Corruption 2003, calls on States parties not only to active involvement of civil society, non-governmental organizations and associations functioning on the basis of communities in the prevention and fight against corruption, but also to promote understanding by the public of the existence, causes and dangerous nature of corruption, and the threat this crime poses.
One of the problems to which the relevant measures are aimed is related to the characteristic perception of the ordinary citizen of corruption. When an act of bribery is committed by a third party, it is identified as an act of corruption, but such a semantic link is lost with respect to various forms of petty corruption used in their personal interests.
In this regard, anti-corruption education is of particular importance, since a person's attitude to corruption is based on the moral and spiritual foundation, is conditioned by his cultural values and level of education, and only the presence of an actual legislative anti-corruption framework does not guarantee the reduction of the risks of corruption. Thus, among the measures contained in art. 13 of the Convention, for example, refers to public awareness activities that contribute to the creation of an atmosphere of intolerance against corruption, as well as public education programs, including curricula in schools and universities.

corruption, worldview, cultural values, education, anti-corruption propaganda.

For citation
Matulis S.N. The Problem of Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Education Measures. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 151—158. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.6.14


Aleksi R. Concept and Validity of Law (response to legal positivism). Moscow, 2011. 192 p. (In Russ.)

Baranov V.M. Areas of Increased Risk in the Activities of Public Authorities from the Perspective of Presumption of Guilt of Officials. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 76—83. (In Russ.)

Criminology. Ed. by A.N. Dolgovaya. Moscow, 2010. 1008 p. (In Russ.)

Khabrieva T.Y., Chernogor N.N. Current Problems of the Strengthening of Rule of Law and Combating Corruption in the Framework of Eurasian Integration. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2017, no. 1, pp. 5—19. (In Russ.)

Rybakov V.A. Sense of Justice: Question of Concepts. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo”. 2015, no. 3, pp. 23—29. (In Russ.)

Truntsevskiy Yu.V. About Four Methods of Corruption Eradication. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2013, no. 12, pp. 30—36. (In Russ.)

Tsirin A.M., Sevalnev V.V., Cherepanova E.V. Conflict of Interest: Law and Ethics. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 49—63. (In Russ.)

Zhuravleva O.N. Formation of Anti-corruption Outlook of Students in the Lessons of History and Social Studies: Handbook. Moscow, 2010. 144 p. (In Russ.)


Contemporary Issues of Improvement of Legislation on Personnel Support of the Public Administration System


A. F. NOZDRACHEV, T. A. LEVONENKOVA, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117218, Russian Federation

Contents of issues: