head of the Department of theory and history of state and law, constitutional law of the Novosibirsk National Research State University, doctor of legal sciences, professor
1, Pirogov st., Novosibirsk, Russia,
630090 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
The article is considering the etymology of human dignity in modern jurisprudence, the problems of identifying the human dignity in constitutional and international discourse, some legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the human dignity, the importance of the balancing principle of protecting the human dignity in constitutional justice, the legal polymorphism of human dignity as legal category.
The aim is to study the boundaries and significance of the dialogue of the doctrine, constitutional norms, international legal acts and social reality in the development of ideas about human dignity, to reveal the national and international conditions for the rise of human dignity in modern jurisprudence, to consider the influence of legal polymorphism on the consolidation of the human dignity in the branches of Russian law, to correlate the constitutional concept of human dignity with the Russian experience of constitutional regulation of human dignity’s protection, and the practice of constitutional justice.
The author used general and specific scientific methods, including formally legal, comparative, concrete historical methods of analysis, methods of constitutional hermeneutics and legal engineering, and a discursive approach that allows determining the meta-legal nature and the polysemic significance of human dignity in contemporary Russian and international jurisprudence.
Conclusions: human dignity is existential rather than moral value, has a divergent nature of applicability in various spheres of legal regulation (domestic and international), there is a public-law and private-law polymorphism of human dignity in Russian law, discusses the possibility of recognizing the principle of respect for and protection of human dignity as a principle of international law, in particular, but interrelated with other principles.
In the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation it is confirmed that: 1) the human dignity is the basis of all human rights and freedoms and a necessary condition for their existence and observance; 2) the Russian state has a legal obligation to protect the dignity of a person and citizen and their rights in all areas where they are realized.
Keywords: human dignity, legal polymorphism, existential value, the principle of international law, judicial constitutionalization, the constitutional principle, the right to dignity.
Barak A. Foreword. Erin D. Dignity Rights: Courts, Constitutions, and the Worth of the Human Person. Philadelphia, 2012.
Barroso L. R. Here, There, and Everywhere: Human Dignity in Contemporary Law and in the Transnational Discourse. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 2012, vol. 35, iss. 2.
Benhabib S. Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge, 2011.
Bentham J. Deontology; or, The Science of Morality: In Which the Harmony and Co-Incidence of Duty and Self-Interest, Virtue and Felicity, Prudence and Benevolence, Are Explained and Exemplified. London; Edinburgh, 1834. Vol. 2.
Bondar N. S. Konstitutsionnaya kategoriya dostoinstva lichnosti v tsennostnom izmerenii: teoriya i sudebnaya praktika. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2017, no. 4.
Chirkin V. Ye. Novelly konstitutsionnogo pravoporyadka: opyt “tsvetnykh revolyutsiy” i “arabskoy vesny”. Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva, 2017, no. 2.
Cicero M. Tullius. De Inventione. Ed. by E. Stroebel. Available at: http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi036.perseus-lat1:2.166.
Dupré C. The Age of Dignity: Human Rights and Constitutionalism in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.
Dzhagaryan A. A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti, ravenstvo i spravedlivost kak sushchnostnye kharakteristiki sotsialnoy gosudarstvennosti. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatelstvo; pravo i upravlenie, 2011, no. 8.
Garnsey P. Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire. Oxford, 1970.
Glensy R. D. The Right to Dignity. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2011, vol. 43, no. 1.
Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Macfarlane F. et al. Storylines of Research in Diffusion of Innovation: A Meta-Narrative Approach to Systematic Review. Social Science & Medicine, 2005, vol. 61.
Habermas J. The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights. Metaphilosophy, 2010, vol. 41, no. 4.
Hennette-Vauchez S. A Human Dignitas? Remnants of the Ancient Legal Concept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, vol. 9, iss. 1. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor031.
In Defense of Human Dignity: Essays for Our Times. Eds. R. P. Kraynak, G. Tinder. Notre Dame, Indiana, 2003.
Izmesteva Ye. M. Subekty pravoprimenitelnoy deyatelnosti v usloviyakh detsentralizatsii pravovogo regulirovaniya v Rossii. Cand. diss. Saratov, 2015.
Jackson V. C. Constitutional Dialogue and Human Dignity: States and Transnational Constitutional Discourse. Montana Law Review, 2004, vol. 65, iss. 1.
Jamal F., Bertotti M., Lorenc Th., Harden A. Reviewing Conceptualisations of Community: Reflections on a Meta-Narrative Approach. Qualitative Research, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 3.
Kateb G. Human Dignity. Cambridge, 2011.
Khabrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. Ye. “Tsvetnye revolyutsii” i “arabskaya vesna” v konstitutsionnom izmerenii: politologo-yuridicheskoe issledovanie. Moscow, 2018.
McCrudden Ch. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 2008, vol. 19, iss. 4.
Muders S. Natural Good Theories and the Value of Human Dignity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2016, vol. 25, iss. 2.
Nevinskiy V. V. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i dostoinstvo cheloveka (vospominanie o budushchem). Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2013, no. 11.
O’Mahony C. There Is no Such Thing as a Right to Dignity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2012, vol. 10, iss. 2. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mos010.
Pozdnyakova O. L. Kantova ideya dostoinstv cheloveka v sisteme tsennostey obshchestvennogo razvitiya. Logika dostoinstva i svobody lichnosti. Ed. L. F. Yevmenov. Minsk, 2016.
Romanova A. A. Sovremennoe apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. Moscow, 2018.
Schachter O. Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. American Journal of International Law, 1983, vol. 77, iss. 4.
Schroeder D., Bani-Sadr A. H. Dignity in the 21st Century: Middle East and West. Springer, 2017.
Shafirov V. M. Pravo v chelovecheskom izmerenii. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie, 2004, no. 3.
Shafirov V. M. Yestestvenno-pozitivnoe pravo (problemy teorii i praktiki). Dr. diss. thesis. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2005.
Shafirov V. M. Yestestvenno-pozitivnoe pravo. Vvedenie v teoriyu. Krasnoyarsk, 2004.
Shershow S. C. Deconstructing Dignity: A Critique of the Right-to-Die Debate. Chicago University Press, 2014.
Societies of International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 1907, vol. 1, no. 1.
Sovet po pravam cheloveka. Konsultativnyy komitet. Vosmaya sessiya 20—24 fevralya 2012 goda. Available at: www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/advisorycommittee/docs/session8/A-HRC-AC-8-4_ru.doc.
Tolstykh V. L. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. Moscow, 2018.
Velyaminov G. M. Pravo natsionalnoe i mezhdunarodnoe. Moscow, 2017.
Weiler A. M., Hergesheimer C., Brisbois B. Food Sovereignty, Food Security and Health Equity: a Meta-Narrative Mapping Exercise. Health Policy and Planning, 2015, vol. 30, iss. 8.